420 Use and Health

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Crow
    replied
    British Columbia (Canada)

    Pot dealer’s hunger strike ends in death

    In the six weeks leading up to his death Istvan Marton ate nothing and thought a lot.

    The 69-year-old was on a hunger strike, appealing to the Canadian government to legalize marijuana, said his sister Juliana Bazso.

    Bazso disapproved of her younger brother’s lifestyle — she says he was the local supplier of weed to the small Malcolm Island community of Sointula off the coast of B.C. — but went to visit Marton as he became progressively more sick.

    “He was only half a size of what he was,” she said. His doctor, Jane Clelland, told the Times-Colonist that Marton’s weight dropped from 79 kilograms to 55 kilograms on his diet of juice, water and clear soup.

    Marton died of a heart attack on Nov. 20. According to Clelland, his death was caused by a combination of the hunger strike and severe health problems.

    Bazso said her unyielding, idealistic younger brother truly believed in his cause and thought of himself as a hero — though she did not believe his plan to change the law would work.

    In an interview with the Times Colonist published the day before his death, Marton defended his drug dealing — mostly selling weed from local growers to the older island population for medicinal and some recreational use.

    “I never hid it. I was the illegal supplier of marijuana for the island and I was really proud of it,” he said.

    Any money he made was donated to underprivileged families, he added.

    In January 2010, he was charged and convicted after the RCMP found 2.2 kilograms of marijuana in his home. He had also been charged of possession of controlled substances in a separate incident in October.

    In the Times Colonist interview, he had said that his hunger strike would have gone on even if the charge was dropped.

    The Hungarian immigrant’s love affair with pot began in the ’70s, said Bazso, adding that her brother — who had spent a few months in jail — had a challenging life.

    While going through his belongings after his death, she found an envelope labeleld “my f---ing life” that contained photos and some papers. In it were musings from his final days, including a note that said his doctor should get a dozen red roses every Friday.

    He also apparently promised his friends $10,000 for a last hurrah after his death, she said. But the eulogy of pot and beer will not happen — Marton only left medical and cable bills to pay and no will, said Bazso.

    “He was a trusting soul and he thought everything was going to be taken care of,” she said.

    Just three weeks before Marton’s death a group of high-profile health, academic and justice experts launched a campaign to legalize and regulate marijuana, a move they say will cut down gang violence and provide new tax revenue. A report released by the group, named Stop the Violence B.C., estimates there are about 430,000 cannabis users in B.C.

    In response, the federal ministry of justice issued a brief statement saying the government has “no intention” of decriminalize or legalize marijuana.
    http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1092776

    ----------------------------------------

    New Jersey (US)

    N.J. lawmakers finalize rules governing medical marijuana program

    TRENTON — Amid signs that New Jersey's medical marijuana program is in disarray, state officials have taken major steps to get six treatment centers serving thousands of patients up and running sometime next year.

    The moves, made in the past week, include putting the finishing touches on rules to govern the program and requesting the six approved growers comply with a final round of evaluation before they plant their first crop.

    But the government will not meet its goal of making pot available to patients before the end of the year.

    The state's program, has been largely idle since it passed into law nearly two years ago, and has faced growing criticism in the past months. The actions follow recent Star-Ledger reports showing the program to be disorganized and far from ready to launch. The newspaper detailed concerns about the vetting of two proposed medical marijuana treatment centers and other problems with the program, including appeals filed by four separate centers challenging the state’s selection process.

    In addition, patients and dispensary officials have growing concerns about the lack of progress in getting the centers up and running. The patients’ I.D. cards have not been made, and the health department is unsure if it will even publish the names of 108 physicians who have pre-registered for the program, leaving patients unsure how they can find an appropriate doctor.

    Chris Goldstein of the patient advocacy group, the Coalition for Medical Marijuana of New Jersey, said he remains disappointed the program will not be running by the end of the year, as Christie said publicly in July. "There hasn’t been a promise kept yet by the legislature or governor," he said.

    Roseanne Scotti, director of the Drug Policy Alliance of New Jersey and one of the primary proponents who helped passed the law in January 2010, was more upbeat about the incremental progress.

    "We are disappointed it won’t be up and running by the end of the year, but progress is progress," she said.

    Scotti said she also is encouraged the Department of Health and Senior Services officials noted in the rules they finalized Wednesday they were willing to revisit one of the most unpopular restrictions: limiting the potency level of the drug to no more than 10 percent.

    The department will cap the potency level at 10 percent for now, but will "collect data from patients to evaluate whether the 10 percent limit on THC should be revisited in future rulemaking,’’ according to a written response from health officials following a March public hearing.

    "We are thrilled the department is willing to consider this moving forward,’’ Scotti said.
    Article continued at: http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/201...marijuana.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    California (US)

    Occupy Wall Street gets its own medical-marijuana strain



    The Occupy Wall Street movement now has its own strain of medical marijuana: Occupy OG.

    Over the last couple of years, medical-marijuana patients in San Diego have witnessed an explosion of "OG Kush" strains—from the "Planetary" series that included Mars OG, Moon OG and Jupiter OG to the Star Wars-themed Skywalker OG, Jedi OG and Vader OG. Earlier this year, a grower came up with Obama OG, named after the president, though local medical marijuana activists took issue with honoring a president whose administration has allowed federal prosecutors to continue to go after dispensaries.

    At some collectives, the variety of OGs (which, we established, *most likely* stands for "Original Gangsta," and indicates that its lineage can be traced back to OG Kush, a famous Los Angeles strain) are kind of gratuitous. It could be that, in some cases, the designation isn't actually a strain, but the name of a particular plant or just a trick to re-brand previously unpopular strains.


    That might be the case with Occupy OG, which costs $15 for a gram or $50 for an eighth. Described as a hybrid strain (a combination of a sativa and indica), Occupy OG is offered by exactly one dispensary in the country, according to Weedmaps.com's database, one of the last to remain open in San Diego following the recent crackdown on dispensaries and their landlords launched by U.S. Attorney Laura Duffy and San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith

    Whatever Occupy OG is, it is not from the plant that was living in the Americans for Safe Access (ASA) tent at the Civic Center in the first weeks of Occupy San Diego. That plant is Skywalker OG and has not yet reached the flowering stage, says Eugene Davidovich, the ASA activist whose lawyers asked for an injunction and temporary restraining order against the San Diego Police Department last week.

    Davidoch says he's hoping for a response from the judge today or tomorrow. In the meantime, he plans to participate in the "re-occupation" of the plaza tonight. Protesters announced yesterday that at least 50 of them will attempt to erect tents again in the Civic Concourse at 5 p.m., even though San Diego Police have made it clear that structures won't be tolerated.
    http://www.sdcitybeat.com/sandiego/b...na-strain.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    United States

    "Empty Gestures From the Obama Administration"

    by Morgan Fox, MPP

    The Obama administration has always paid lip service to the idea of pursuing more sensible drug policy, but has rarely lived up to its promises. From launching state-to-state crackdowns on medical marijuana providers despite promises to let states determine their own policies to attempting to license the federal government’s marijuana patent for profit while claiming that marijuana has no accepted medical value, the Obama administration continues to disappoint on this issue. Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske may say that the War on Drugs is over, but “legalization” still isn’t in the President’s vocabulary, and the war on marijuana users is still in full effect.

    Given this unfortunate history, the administration’s signals of hope last week rang even more hollow.

    The three pardons granted last week by Obama to former marijuana prisoners could be viewed as a step in the right direction for an administration that has consistently increased its enforcement against marijuana violations. It is certainly a boon for those three individuals, who will no longer have to deal with the stigma of arrest and incarceration haunting them the rest of their lives. Those three people will find it easier to find employment, apply for student loans and federal education assistance, and will finally be able to vote again.

    The recipients of these pardons should be lauded for becoming pillars of their communities after their incarceration. But how many pillars have been torn from their communities by prohibition, whether for providing medicine to sick people or simply choosing to relax with a substance that is safer than alcohol?

    Those three people should be celebrating. The mitigation of the effects the war on marijuana has had on their lives is long overdue. But that celebration provides no solace to the 853,000 people arrested in the U.S. in 2010 for marijuana violations, 750,000 of which were for simple possession. Nor does it comfort the families of those who have died at the hands of the police during marijuana raids, or those who have lost beloved family pets and property to marijuana prohibition.

    The press conference given by Gil Kerlikowske last Monday is perhaps even more insulting to supporters of drug policy reform. The purpose of this event was to address concerns that minority populations were being disproportionately affected by drug laws and what could be done to fix this problem. While he proposed many positive efforts to reduce the effect that drugs have in the African-American community, he overlooked some glaring facts.

    Even though marijuana use among whites is higher than in any racial demographic, minorities are arrested for marijuana violations at a staggeringly higher rate throughout the country. This disparity in arrests, as well as the accompanying disparity in sentencing for drug crimes has an undeniably detrimental effect on African-American and Hispanic families and communities that is directly tied to the ability of police to arrest people for marijuana. Even in New York City, where marijuana possession is technically decriminalized, law enforcement found a loophole to facilitate the arrests of over 50,000 people a year for marijuana violations. The vast majority of those arrestees are people of color. Until we remove the threat of arrest, we cannot adequately or realistically confront the impact of drugs in any community.

    Kerlikowske is right: we cannot arrest our way out of our drug problems. Logic would suggest, then, that we stop trying. For the drug czar to propose fixing those problems for minorities while leaving policies in place that undeniably support systemic racism is disgraceful.

    It may be a good sign that the Obama administration is looking at this issue with a little more interest, and is moving along harm reduction lines to solve it, but the fact remains that the government is still at war with marijuana users. We need to go further. There must be a legitimate dialogue in the White House to mirror the one occurring on an international level and among voters about the failure of marijuana prohibition.
    http://blog.mpp.org/prohibition/4741/11282011/

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Study shows medical marijuana laws reduce traffic deaths; leads to lower consumption of alcohol

    DENVER (Nov. 29, 2011) – A groundbreaking new study shows that laws legalizing medical marijuana have resulted in a nearly nine percent drop in traffic deaths and a five percent reduction in beer sales.

    “Our research suggests that the legalization of medical marijuana reduces traffic fatalities through reducing alcohol consumption by young adults,” said Daniel Rees, professor of economics at the University of Colorado Denver who co-authored the study with D. Mark Anderson, assistant professor of economics at Montana State University.

    The researchers collected data from a variety of sources including the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System.

    The study is the first to examine the relationship between the legalization of medical marijuana and traffic deaths.

    “We were astounded by how little is known about the effects of legalizing medical marijuana,” Rees said. “We looked into traffic fatalities because there is good data, and the data allow us to test whether alcohol was a factor.”

    Anderson noted that traffic deaths are significant from a policy standpoint.

    “Traffic fatalities are an important outcome from a policy perspective because they represent the leading cause of death among Americans ages five to 34,” he said.

    The economists analyzed traffic fatalities nationwide, including the 13 states that legalized medical marijuana between 1990 and 2009. In those states, they found evidence that alcohol consumption by 20- through 29-year-olds went down, resulting in fewer deaths on the road.

    The economists noted that simulator studies conducted by previous researchers suggest that drivers under the influence of alcohol tend to underestimate how badly their skills are impaired. They drive faster and take more risks. In contrast, these studies show that drivers under the influence of marijuana tend to avoid risks. However, Rees and Anderson cautioned that legalization of medical marijuana may result in fewer traffic deaths because it’s typically used in private, while alcohol is often consumed at bars and restaurants.

    “I think this is a very timely study given all the medical marijuana laws being passed or under consideration,” Anderson said. “These policies have not been research-based thus far and our research shows some of the social effects of these laws. Our results suggest a direct link between marijuana and alcohol consumption.”

    The study also examined marijuana use in three states that legalized medical marijuana in the mid-2000s, Montana, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Marijuana use by adults increased after legalization in Montana and Rhode Island, but not in Vermont. There was no evidence that marijuana use by minors increased.



    “Although we make no policy recommendations, it certainly appears as though medical marijuana laws are making our highways safer,” Rees said.
    Full article at: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-ssm112911.php

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Amsterdam (Netherlands)

    HIGH TIMES Cannabis Cup Raided in Amsterdam

    Early this morning, Dutch authorities raided the HIGH TIMES Cannabis Cup in Amsterdam. UPDATE from HIGH TIMES Magazine:

    According to representatives for HIGH TIMES magazine, sponsors of the 24th Annual Cannabis Cup in Amsterdam, the event will continue tonight with a scheduled concert at the Melkweg concert hall (Lijnbaansgracht 234), followed by a full day of the expo (including voting) at the Borchland (Borchlandweg) on Thursday, the final day of the competition. An additional voting station will be set up starting at 2PM on Thursday at the Melkweg, which will remain open until the beginning of the official Cannabis Cup awards ceremony at 8PM.


    “They herded everybody toward one exit, like you’re getting on a ski lift at Vail… then one by one they had about 40 cops there for a little talk and search… People were dropping grams and grams of hash on the ground… baggies littering the floor… people were smoking it if you had it because you weren’t rolling out with it!”
    It should be noted that none of this is precipitated by any change in Dutch law. These limits on personal and vendor possession, disposal of trimmings, and prohibitions on cannabis concentrates have existed throughout the 24-year history of the Cannabis Cup.

    What has changed is a new, more conservative government in the Netherlands that seeks to “send a message” about cannabis use. They began with the closing of border coffee shops to all but Dutch, Belgian, and German passport holders, claiming that “foreign drug tourism” was leading to a host of social ills.

    http://blog.norml.org/2011/11/23/hig...-in-amsterdam/

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Washington (US)

    "Washington's effort to legalize marijuana faces legal pitfalls"

    by Gene Johnson, AP

    SEATTLE -- An effort to decriminalize and tax recreational marijuana sales for adults in Washington state has won some high-profile endorsements - including from two former Seattle U.S. attorneys and the former head of the FBI here - and its sponsors are well on their way to collecting enough signatures to place the measure before the Legislature.

    Supporters say it would boost funding for education and public health, and polls show a slight majority of Washington voters approve.

    But Initiative 502 faces serious legal pitfalls. Not only could the federal agents raid and shut down the state-licensed pot grows and retail stores, they could ask a judge to simply throw out the entire system on the grounds that it conflicts with federal law.

    And that new tax revenue, conservatively estimated at $215 million a year? The feds can almost certainly just take it, as proceeds of drug deals that remain illegal under federal law.

    Whether the federal government would actually take such steps is anybody's guess - and it's what makes the effort, which is being closely watched by legalization advocates around the country, a gamble.

    "This is an evolving area of the law," says Alison Holcomb, the initiative's campaign director. "We'd be foolhardy to say we think we know what's going to happen."

    Initiative 502 would create a system of state-licensed growers, processors and stores, and would impose a 25 percent excise tax at each stage. Adults 21 and over could buy up to an ounce of dried marijuana; one pound of marijuana-infused product in solid form, such as brownies; or 72 ounces of marijuana-infused liquids. It would be illegal to drive with more than 5 nanograms of THC, the active ingredient of cannabis, per milliliter of blood.

    Holcomb's group, New Approach Washington, is pushing the measure at a time of serious upheaval in the marijuana world, with the Obama administration pressuring states and cities that attempt to regulate the medical marijuana industry.

    Federal prosecutors in California have announced a concerted effort to warn property owners that they could face sanctions if they rent to marijuana grows or dispensaries, and the DOJ has made clear that prosecuting commercial marijuana businesses remains a priority. Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee announced last month that he was suspending a system to license nonprofit "compassion centers" where people could get medical pot, out of concerns it would violate federal law. And the raids on 19 medical marijuana dispensaries by Drug Enforcement Administration agents and sheriffs' deputies in Western Washington last week served as a wake-up call about how much the feds will tolerate here.

    At the same time, Washington isn't alone in considering legalizing the fun use of marijuana. Colorado will vote next year if a similar measure there makes the ballot. Supporters say that treating marijuana use as a crime has failed, and now is the time to decriminalize, tax and regulate the drug.

    Whether states can get away with enacting such systems - whether they can regulate a substance that is illegal under federal law - isn't clear.

    No one disputes that federal authorities have the power to enforce federal law, and thus could shut down state-licensed marijuana gardens or stores at whim, arresting the proprietors and prosecuting them in federal court.

    Nor do many dispute that states have the power to decriminalize marijuana under their own laws. That's why states can "legalize" medical marijuana - they simply decide to stop prosecuting people for certain offenses. Federal authorities can't make state officials enforce federal law, and there aren't nearly enough DEA agents or assistant U.S. attorneys to keep up with all the marijuana gardens, dispensaries or patients.


    The stickier issue is whether states can go beyond simple decriminalization by setting up licensing or other regulatory schemes. In such cases, rather than doing nothing in the face of federal marijuana prohibition - i.e., not prosecuting people under state law - a state would be doing something, and that something could arguably conflict with federal law. When state and federal laws conflict, the federal law wins out; it "preempts" the state law.

    "Can the feds bring a challenge on preemption grounds? Yes. Will they prevail? We don't know," Holcomb says.

    She says I-502 is drafted as strongly as possible to survive such a challenge. The Controlled Substances Act contains a provision saying that it will only preempt state laws that are in "positive conflict" with it - in other words, if the state law forces someone to violate federal law. I-502 doesn't do that, Holcomb says, because a citizen could comply with both laws by simply not buying, growing or selling marijuana. The licensing scheme simply helps state police determine who is complying with state law, she said.

    Karl Manheim, a constitutional law professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, said he tended to agree with that analysis, and two recent opinions from state appeals courts in California took the view that states can take some regulatory steps without running afoul of the federal Controlled Substances Act.


    But another California appeals court ruling last month took the opposite view. It unanimously said that in addition to considering whether a state law forces someone to violate federal law, courts must also look at whether the state law "frustrates the purpose" of federal laws. The court noted that there is some question as to whether state or local officials could be liable for aiding and abetting federal crimes. The court threw out a dispensary licensing scheme in Long Beach on the grounds that it authorized people to engage in conduct at odds with the federal law, and thus frustrated the purpose of the federal law.

    The Oregon Supreme Court came to the same conclusion last year in determining that that state's medical marijuana law could be preempted by federal law.

    Under such a rationale, licensing schemes that already exist for medical marijuana distribution - such as in Colorado and New Mexico - would also be subject to federal preemption. But the DOJ has never made any such arguments. Some speculate it's because the distribution was for medical reasons, and trumping such laws would be more unpopular than trumping a scheme for distributing recreational marijuana.

    In an interview this week, Seattle U.S. Attorney Jenny Durkan declined to discuss whether she believed the Justice Department could preempt I-502.

    "Every lawyer that I have talked to, including those who support the initiative, think that it will be preempted by federal law," Durkan said.

    Douglas Hiatt, a Seattle medical marijuana attorney and advocate of legalization, agrees. He argues that it requires those who would apply for licenses to incriminate themselves in violation of the Fifth Amendment, that the state would be laundering money when it taxes marijuana transfers, and that the intoxicated driving limit is so strict that it would keep medical marijuana patients from driving at all.

    If the parts of I-502 he considers unconstitutional were struck down, the result could be that Washington would wind up with possession of up to an ounce of marijuana being decriminalized, with no way to legally buy it, he said.

    Holcomb disputes his criticism, but concedes the Justice Department almost certainly could seize any taxes collected through a "forfeiture" action - one that requires the disgorgement of proceeds of illegal activity.

    Ultimately, both Holcomb and Hiatt propose legalization approaches that might be preempted by federal law. Hiatt's group, Sensible Washington, wants to first repeal all state criminal and civil penalties for marijuana in any amount. Having done that, Hiatt argues, marijuana would be totally legal under state law - and the Legislature could then pass regulations governing pot sales.


    Faced with the choice between no state pot laws and whatever regulation scheme the Legislature comes up with, the DOJ would be less likely to seek to invalidate the Legislature's scheme, Hiatt argues. That's the strategy states used in knocking down the federal prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s and '30s.

    But Sensible Washington's initiative has twice failed to qualify for the ballot.

    Holcomb hopes the DOJ will not try to preempt I-502 - that the feds will ultimately consider its licensing and taxing scheme a lesser evil than the "wild West" of full decriminalization.
    Johnson can be reached at https://twitter.com/GeneAPseattle

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Washington (US)

    SeaTac Joins List of Airports Allowing Medical Cannabis Onboard

    It takes a special kind of confidence to openly display your medical cannabis patient status—not to mention your medicine itself—in the face of a Transportation Security Administration airport employee. The repercussions could easily expand well beyond a missed flight. But because Tacoma resident Mike Schaef is exactly that kind of confident, we now know that patients can board planes departing from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport with their cannabis.

    Schaef, who operates a medical cannabis patient collective called North End Club 420, was going through the SeaTac security line when he placed about two grams of cannabis in a bowl to be scanned. It was seized, but after just a few minutes of speaking with a handful of federal and local officials the cannabis was documented and returned, and Schaef proceeded to his flight.

    He shared a photo on Facebook shortly thereafter, accompanied by a caption reading, “This is what happens when u put your meds in the scanner bowl at seatac….they let me go and gave it back…said have a nice flight….”

    Steve Elliott of Toke of the Town contacted SeaTac Airport last week to ask about their policy regarding Washington medical marijuana patients boarding flights while possessing cannabis. The response: “I don’t see a problem, as long as they have a doctor’s authorization,” according to airport spokeswoman Charla Scaggs.

    That would mean SeaTac joins a list that includes Bay Area airports like San Francisco International, Oakland International, and San Jose International in allowing cannabis into its terminals. A report surfacing in August 2010 also indicated medical cannabis was allowed inside Montana airports, but the current status is unclear after a Republican-controlled legislature in the state scaled back its medical cannabis laws.
    -------------------------------------

    Seattle Times' Northwest Voices: "Transform liquor stores into marijuana stores"

    The state of Washington will be out of the liquor business by June 1, 2012, and now has a fortuitous opportunity. Consider this:

    Law enforcement is devoting enormous amounts of effort, manpower and funds in a largely ineffective effort to stop marijuana use. So-called medical marijuana usage has soared, public opinion is shifting toward legalizing marijuana, crime syndicates reap large profits from marijuana sales and now former U.S. Attorney John McKay has spoken strongly in favor of legalization. [“He fought pot, now leads effort to make it legal here,” page one, Nov. 17.]

    The day after the liquor stores close they could reopen as marijuana stores. Nine-hundred jobs would be saved and the state would have a new generous source of income, police efforts could be redirected to better serve the public, marijuana use would be controlled and crime profits would drop.

    Of course, this would require quick, innovative and decisive action by a state Legislature not known for quick, innovative and decisive action.

    — Harry Petersen, Bellevue

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Missouri (US)

    Efforts underway to put cannabis legalisation on the 2012 Missouri ballot

    Efforts are currently underway to put marijuana legalization on the ballot in Missouri next year. Missouri NORML and Show-me Cannabis Regulation are working together to acquire the number of signatures required to put a Constitutional amendment proposal before Missouri voters in November 2012. Missouri now joins several other states (including California, Washington, and Colorado) that are looking to put the issue of cannabis legalization before voters next election.

    If you live in Missouri, and want to get involved, MO NORML and Show-me Cannabis Regulation will be holding a strategy meeting this Saturday, November 19th. For more information see the message below from Dan Viets, Missouri NORML Coordinator.
    Dear Friends and Supporters of Missouri NORML:

    Missouri NORML in conjunction with Show-Me Cannabis Regulation is holding a special meeting next Saturday, November 19, 2011 from noon to 6:00 p.m. at the Arts & Science building at the University of Missouri here in Columbia. this event will be a kickoff for the campaign to place marijuana legalization on the Missouri ballot in November, 2012.

    We will be brainstorming ideas for how to move this campaign forward effectively and efficiently. We will be sharing ideas with our fellow activists from the state of Missouri. We will be talking with folks who have experience in similar campaigns to get their advice on how we can gather the signatures we need as quickly as possible.

    SMCR has chosen to proceed with a Constitutional amendment proposal. This means we will need to gather nearly 150,000 signatures on petitions to place this issue on the ballot before next May. We will need the help of every one of our supporters to make this happen.

    Following the meeting Saturday afternoon, we will hold a Dinner/Party/Fundraising event at one of Columbia’s finest restaurants. We ask everyone who attends to please bring something, large or small, which can be auctioned to help us raise funds for the campaign.

    Please join us and become part of this historic effort to end the terrible injustice of cannabis prohibition in Missouri. For more information about the proposed initiative, go to www.showmecannabis.org. There is a football game in Columbia next Saturday so hotel and motel rooms will be in short supply. If you plan to stay in Columbia, you should probably search for a room immediately. You may need to look at accommodations in towns nearby since the hotels here may be full.

    Sincerely,
    Dan Viets, Missouri NORML Coordinator

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Originally posted by BadAxe
    So Seattleite, we hear the argument all the time that the feds doing what they are doing in states where its legal, that its a violation of the 10th ammendment to the constitution. What is your opinion on this. Is it? And if so, do you believe the recent lawsuits in Cali will accomplish anything? Will federal level judges rule in favor of states rights?
    Yes, I think it is a violation of the 10th amendment. I also think that it's equitable estoppel (based on AG Holder's memo), and as the NORML lawyers have pointed out; it is also a violation of the 14th amendment given the fact that the federal government has its own medical cannabis program (Compassionate IND), and is actively trying to restrict scientific research regarding medical cannabis.

    Will we win the lawsuit in California? Normally I would make the prediction, but this time I'm not sure.

    The evidence is clear as day, and I can only hope the judge will side with the American people.

    -------------------------------------------

    One thing is certain: The cannabis reform movement is winning, and the second prohibition is slowly coming to an end. They can raid dispensaries and disrupt society, but they can't suppress the people. People are beginning to wake up and see the injustice being committed, and they have had enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • BadAxe
    replied
    So Seattleite, we hear the argument all the time that the feds doing what they are doing in states where its legal, that its a violation of the 10th ammendment to the constitution. What is your opinion on this. Is it? And if so, do you believe the recent lawsuits in Cali will accomplish anything? Will federal level judges rule in favor of states rights?

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Washington (US)

    DEA raids Washington marijuana dispensaries in cities that set marijuana as lowest enforcement priority

    Multiple news outlets are reporting DEA and local officials raiding over a dozen dispensaries in the Seattle-area counties of King, Thurston, and Pierce in Washington State.
    The Olympian reports:

    The Thurston County Narcotics Task Force served search warrants at five medicinal marijuana dispensaries Tuesday morning and shut them down, according to a police spokesman.
    The News-Tribune reports:

    Five dispensaries were targeted in Thurston County and five in Pierce County, law enforcement officials reported. So far, no arrests have been reported from the searches in Pierce and Thurston counties.

    The warrants targeted locations that are suspected of not complying with state law on medical marijuana, Pierce County sheriff’s spokesman Ed Troyer said.

    “The places we hit are not compliant with state law so we initiated enforcement,” he said. “There are facilities and people that are in compliance with the law that we did not hit.”
    KOMO reports:

    Medical marijuana activist group ‘Sensible Washington’ tells KOMO News searches have been conducted so far at Seattle Cannabis Co-op, Game Collective, Tacoma Cross, Lacey Cross and Seattle Cross among others.

    KOMO News asked DEA spokeswoman Jodie Underwood if agents were serving search warrants on dispensaries in other counties as well and she acknowledged agents were serving several search warrants locally.
    Remember, these raids are taking place in Tacoma, which just had an election last week on this very issue of marijuana law enforcement:

    (Seattle Times) Tacoma voters easily passed citywide ballot Initiative No. 1 — the measure seeking to make “marijuana or cannabis offenses … the lowest enforcement priority” of the city.

    After Tuesday night’s count, 65 percent of voters favored the measure, while 35 percent cast no votes.
    And Seattle, which had made marijuana law enforcement its cops’ lowest priority in 2003 by a 58% vote:

    (Seattle P-I) Since Seattle voters famously made the Emerald City a bit greener by mandating that cops mellow out when it comes to marijuana possession busts, a funny thing has happened.

    Nothing. Nada. Nil. No crazy hopheads running amok with “reefer madness.” No groundswell of support to legalize the drug (at least no more than usual), and no discernible protest by law enforcement that a pro-drug message effectively has been sent — or received.

    “I’d say it’s had little to no effect,” said [former] City Attorney Tom Carr, an outspoken opponent of Initiative 75, the 2003 ballot measure that directed Seattle police to make low-level pot busts their lowest priority. “And that’s good. It hasn’t been a problem. You can tell by the numbers.”
    Seattle is so accepting of marijuana that the new city attorney, Pete Holmes, won’t even prosecute you for personal possession and believes marijuana should be legalized, as does the mayor, Mike McGinn. Even the Seattle City Council is unanimous in their support for medical marijuana dispensaries.



    The people of Washington State don’t seem to have as much problem with marijuana as the people of Washington, D.C.

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Michigan & Washington (US)

    Two more cities de-prioritize marijuana possession

    Karen O'Keefe, MPP

    Yesterday, voters in Kalamazoo, Michigan and Tacoma, Washington directed local law enforcement to make marijuana possession the lowest enforcement priority. The measures passed by 2:1 margins, garnering nearly 65% of the vote in Tacoma and 66% in Kalamazoo.

    With only 61-66% of homicide cases in this country cleared every year, and only 12% of burglaries cleared, it’s not surprising that voters think police should have more important things to do than arresting individuals who possess a substance safer than alcohol. While crimes with actual victims went unsolved, police found time for the arrests, bookings, and court time associated with more than 750,000 marijuana possession arrests in the U.S. in 2009.

    Kalamazoo and Tacoma are far from alone in directing police to find better things to do than arrest marijuana users. More than a dozen cities and counties —with a total population of over 3.3 million — have directed law enforcement to de-prioritize marijuana possession enforcement.

    Congratulations to all who were involved in these sensible measures that will prevent the convictions and resulting stigmatization and heartache that can haunt people for life.

    This is one more step in the turning tide. In less than a year, voters in Colorado, Washington, and possibly other states will be deciding whether to replace marijuana prohibition with regulation in their states. With 50% of Americans now supporting making marijuana use legal, we are hopeful that the first states will have opted out of prohibition by this time next year.
    http://blog.mpp.org/prohibition/two-...sion/11092011/

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Tacoma, Washington (US)

    Voters approve "CITY OF TACOMA Initiative 1"

    This Initiative amends Tacoma Municipal Code Title 8 to provide that marijuana or cannabis offenses be the lowest enforcement priority of the City of Tacoma.
    Yes (16,930) 64.66%

    No (9,255) 35.34%

    Total Votes (26,185) 100%
    -----------------------------

    Complete text of
    Tacoma Initiative No. 1

    WHEREAS, the voters of Seattle in 2003 adopted Initiative 75 relating to making enforcement of cannabis-related offenses the lowest priority for their police department and prosecutor’s offices; and

    WHEREAS, the Tacoma Municipal Code contains no similar provisions; and

    WHEREAS, the city council last October unofficially made an agreement, with the then-existing medical dispensaries and cooperatives, that they and their patients would not be harassed until after the Washington State Legislature had an opportunity to clarify state Initiative 692, establishing a medical cannabis distribution structure this year; and

    WHEREAS, House Bill 1550 failed to make it out of committee and Senate Bill 5073 has been watered down as of the date of this petition’s filing:

    Be it ordained by the voters in the City of Tacoma that:

    A new ordinance is adopted and new sections of Tacoma Municipal Code Title 8 are hereby adopted:

    Section 1. Findings and Intent – The voters of the City of Tacoma find that there is a compelling need to reduce the enforcement of criminal and civil penalties against the users of both medical and non-medical cannabis. This reduction will not only minimize or eliminate harassment against lawfully-consuming cannabis patients, and will have financial savings in the city’s budget.

    Section 2. Subject – This Act deals with the implementation of policy relating to law enforcement. This Act is to be known as the

    “REFORM CANNABIS ACT”

    Section 3. Text – The police chief and city attorney shall make the investigation, arrest, and prosecution of cannabis (a/k/a “marijuana”) offenses the lowest enforcement priority, as this term may be defined in their policies and procedures manuals, for adult personal use.

    Section 4. Code Provisions – New code sections 8.28.005, 8.29.005, 8.72.005, and 8.160.005 are hereby created and added to Title 8 of the TMC, each containing the language of Section 3.

    Section 5. Severability – The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The voters of Tacoma declare that they support each of the provisions of this Act independently, and their support for this Act would not be diminished if one or more of its provisions were to be held invalid, or if any of them were adopted by the City Council and the others sent to the voters for approval.

    Section 6. Interpretation – This Act is to be liberally construed to achieve the defined intent of the voters.

    -END-

    Leave a comment:


  • desirexe
    replied
    Originally posted by BadAxe
    They do have it in pill form. Unfortunately, Big Pharma also created marinol, a synthetic substance, that has side effects. ANd they love to point ot Marinol and tell you whats bad about pot. But real pot pills are made by people everyday. For recreational purposes, I love smoking/vaping. The taste and the process is aprt of the recreational enjoyment for me. So I would never want my recreational high to just come from a pill. I could do chemicals for that. But for medicianl purposes i can totally understand wanting a pill or an edible, and yes, those are readily available.

    Not sure why you take Oxy's, but yes, put in a pill form or edible form can really help with pain, and could possibly lead to replacing your addictive chemicals. I would look into that if I were you. I rarely take pain pills for anything. A couple cookies and I am feeling much more relaxed with reduced pain. I get better pain relief from MJ when eating edibles, then from smoking or vaping. Vaping is just my recreational choice. Edibles are my medicinal choice.
    Oxys were just for after-surgery and I only took them for a week. I would have loved to try mj in any form just for the experience and to see first hand if it reduced my pain. I would have preferred to have skipped the percs, they made me itchy as hell!! I had to choose between itching or pain, the first was more tolerable. BTW - I have never even heard of Marinol, I'll definitely research that for educational purposes. Thanks for the info!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied

    Leave a comment:

Related Topics

Collapse

Working...
X