so the wife is making me buy a vape today. Not for tobacco. I need one thats portable and easy to use. Mainly for a hit or 2 at a time for 1 or 2 people to use. any suggestions?
so the wife is making me buy a vape today. For tobacco use only of course. I need one thats portable and easy to use. Mainly for a hit or 2 at a time for 1 or 2 people to use. any suggestions?
Liberal Convention 2012: Federal Grits Vote To Legalize Marijuana
The Liberal Party of Canada has voted to legalize pot.
Seventy-seven per cent of delegates at the Liberals' biennial convention told their party's leadership Sunday morning that they want a future Liberal government to legalize marijuana.
Their interim leader Bob Rae acknowledged the war on drugs hasn’t worked, but told reporters the party's caucus would have to study the implications of the resolution.
"Frankly, the status quo doesn't work and that's what needs to change,” Rae said. “The Liberal party is saying that the current laws do not work and that we need a new direction.”
“It’s now up to us to take that resolution and see exactly what it will mean in terms of policy, because there are some practical questions that we have to look at,” Rae added, noting in French that one such issue would be how to control the supply of legalized pot.
Rae insisted he was at ease defending the principles of the resolution and that he would work with the membership on the issue in the months and years ahead as the party drafts its next election platform.
“I accept that it is the will of the party that was expressed and as leader we will continue to work together,” Rae said.
During a debate on the floor of the Ottawa convention hall, one Liberal delegate, a police officer, told the crowd Canada’s drug policy was misguided.
“This country does not need more prisons, it needs less criminals,” he said.
The resolution, which was brought forward by the party's youth wing, calls upon a Liberal federal government to legalize, regulate and tax marijuana production, distribution and use while enacting “strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving.”
The resolution also calls for significant investments in prevention and education programs on the harms of marijuana and amnesty for Canadians convicted of simple possession in the past.
Samuel Lavoie, the president of the Young Liberals of Canada, said he wasn’t sure the resolution would make it into the Liberal party’s next election platform, but that he hoped it would not be ignored.
“I think everyone in the party, not only the interim leader (Rae), but everyone in the party, recognizes that there were 3,000 Liberals here this weekend and that this is a motion which, however controversial, passed with more than 75% of support, so I think it would be difficult for anyone to just ignore the result and the will of the membership,” he said.
Liberals should stop being scared of any soft on crime label the Conservative party might give them, Lavoie added.
“The Conservative staffers in the Prime Minister’s office will never vote for the Liberal party,” Lavoie said. “We are talking to Canadians, the fact is this is a sensible policy, an evidence-based policy that is very easy to defend and polls show that we have a majority of support amongst Canadians. There is a cross-partisan support amongst non-conservative voters for this. So we feel like this is something that will get us votes not lose us votes,” he said.
More than 1,400 delegates took part in the vote. If Liberal members re-affirm the motion in two years during another policy process, the Liberal leader will still have the right to veto any part of the election platform under current rules.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer relents; dispensaries will be registered
by Karen O'Keefe, MPP
Today, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) announced she will not re-file her lawsuit questioning the validity of Arizona’s medical marijuana program. She also announced that once litigation is resolved challenging the health department rules, her health department will begin issuing dispensary registrations.
Gov. Brewer’s announcement follows a January 4 ruling dismissing her lawsuit. Judge Susan Bolton agreed with the ACLU, Department of Justice, and other attorneys, and found that there was no genuine, imminent threat that state employees would be prosecuted. Bolton said that Brewer could re-file if the problems with her complaint were addressed.
The U.S. attorney for Arizona at the time the case was filed, Dennis Burke, sent a letter to the Arizona health department on May 2, 2011 that flew in the face of the Obama Administration’s stated policy of not targeting those complying with state medical marijuana laws. Burke’s letter said “the [federal] CSA may be vigorously enforced against those individuals and entities who operate large marijuana production facilities” even if they are in compliance with state laws, as well as those who “knowingly facilitate the actions of traffickers.” After receiving the letter, Gov. Brewer directed Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne to file the litigation requesting clarity, even though Burke told media outlets that his office would not target state employees.
Today, Gov. Brewer wrote the acting U.S. attorney for Arizona, Ann Birmingham Scheel, noting her plans to finally move forward. Brewer requested clarification as to whether there are any activities state employees should not engage in and said “the Department of Justice and the administration which you serve will have a lot of explaining to do to the citizens of our country, and State of Arizona employees in particular, if the State’s reasonable and straightforward requests for clarity are ignored, and the Department of Justice then ambushes State employees with prosecution or civil penalties for implementing the AMMA and licensing medical marijuana dispensaries.”
Now, only one governor is stubbornly refusing to move forward with implementing a duly enacted medical marijuana dispensary program: Gov. Lincoln Chafee (I) of Rhode Island. Here’s hoping he finally sees the light.
Michigan Marijuana Amendment Would End Debate Over Medicinal Use
Michigan marijuana activists are gearing up for a campaign to amend the state's constitution to legalize the herb.
If passed, the proposed amendment would end the prohibition of marijuana in Michigan. It covers the cultivation, use, sale and distribution of the cannabis plant for adults over the age of 21.
Charmie Gholson, communications director for Committee for a Safer Michigan, the Detroit-based group sponsoring the effort, told HuffPost that media reports claiming a petition drive in favor of the amendment would start this week were a bit premature. Organizers are still waiting for the exact formatting of the proposal to be approved by the State of Michigan, but expect to make a formal announcement next week.
Medical marijuana bills filed in Florida House and Senate
By Anne Geggis, Gainesville Sun
A state budget crunch that won’t quit, legislative reapportionment and gaming are expected to crowd the legislative season that starts in Tallahassee Tuesday — but for some, nothing has quite the same buzz as an effort to allow the medical use of marijuana.
It’s the second year in a row that legislation has been filed to start Florida on the path that 16 other states and the District of Columbia have taken, starting with California in 1996. And this year represents the first time that a bill allowing marijuana as a medicinal has been filed in both the House and the Senate.
For some from the home of “Gainesville Green” — a celebrated strain of marijuana — and the recently revived Hemp Fest — including those who have served jail time for being a “Doobie Tosser” — this legislation can’t come quickly enough.
House Joint Resolution 353 and Senate Joint Resolution 1028 propose that the question of allowing marijuana for medical use should appear on the 2012 ballot as a statewide referendum. If approved by at least 60 percent of the voters, the state constitution would be amended.
Never mind that neither of the bills has been scheduled for hearings. Jodi James, executive director of the Florida Cannabis Action Network, is, well, elated.
“This is the first time since 1978 that cannabis advocates will have a sustained presence in the Legislature,” said James, explaining that her Melbourne-based group has launched a website, www.fldecides.org in the effort.
Even more than advocating for the proposed legislation, James’ group is planning on petitioning Gov. Rick Scott, asking him to urge the Legislature to pass a bill that bypasses the constitutional amendment process and allows medical marijuana use in Florida.
“Sick and dying people need access to this medicine now,” James said.
Smoking a joint once a week or a bit more apparently doesn't harm the lungs, suggests a 20-year study that bolsters evidence that marijuana doesn't do the kind of damage tobacco does.
Smoking a joint once a week or a bit more apparently doesn't harm the lungs, suggests a 20-year study that bolsters evidence that marijuana doesn't do the kind of damage tobacco does.
The results, from one of the largest and longest studies on the health effects of marijuana, are hazier for heavy users - those who smoke two or more joints daily for several years. The data suggest that using marijuana that often might cause a decline in lung function, but there weren't enough heavy users among the 5,000 young adults in the study to draw firm conclusions.
Still, the authors recommended "caution and moderation when marijuana use is considered."
Marijuana is an illegal drug under federal law although some states allow its use for medical purposes.
In my clinical practice I use holy basil to enhance cerebral circulation and memory. It is used in ayurvedic medicine to relieve “mental fog” caused by chronic cannabis smoking. It can be combined with other cerebral stimulants such as rosemary, bacopa, and ginkgo to help people with menopausal cloudy thinking, poor memory, attention deficit disorder (ADD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to speed up recovery from head trauma.
[Fact: Drugs are pervasive in our society and, one way or another, adolescents will be exposed to mind-altering substances.]
It is an unmistakable reality that a significant number of high school students will try marijuana. According to the recent 2011 Monitoring the Future Survey, nearly 40 percent of all high school seniors admit to having smoked marijuana in the past year – a percentage that has held relatively stable since the study’s inception over 35 years ago.
Some want to use this fact as a justification to deny any opportunity to rationally discuss marijuana, its use, and its risks with children in an open and honest manner. They think that saying anything about marijuana other than encouraging its total abstinence is condoning its use. This couldn’t be further from the truth.
When society teaches sex education, are we suggesting that all the teenagers go out and engage in sexual intercourse? No. Rather, it is an acknowledgement that the best way to reduce the negative effects associated with sex (unwanted pregnancy, STD’s, etc) is through honest, objective information that allow people to understand their options and provides them with the tools they need to make informed decisions.
When we talk to teenagers about the dangers of drinking and driving, are we condoning alcohol use among minors? No, of course not. It is, however, a reality that many adolescents will a) likely consume alcohol as seniors in high school and b) have access to a car. Yes, we encourage students not to drink. But, we urge them specifically not to drink and drive.
We can all agree that teens should not smoke pot, or be using any mind-altering substances. Those are important, developmental years. Still, teens should be educated regarding how smoking marijuana can affect their body’s development specifically, how to reduce any harms associated with its use, and to distinguish between use and abuse. There should be honest, truthful drug education.
As Kristen Gwynne states in her AlterNet article, “Give young people accurate information, and they will use it to make better decisions that result in less harm to themselves, because teens, like everybody else, do not actually want to get hurt or become addicts.”
She goes on to say, “Giving students honest information about drugs [will]…increase the odds that they will use drugs safely, and reduce the likelihood of experiencing the [relative] harms associated with [it].”
By contrast, the Drug Czar and federal law advocates for complete prohibition, limited information explaining the real effects of marijuana and condemning any opportunity, as Gwynne states, to provide “education that helps teens understand their health options, and ways of reducing the harm of drugs.” When it comes to our children, like everything else we teach in school for development and behavioral growth, drug education should be based in reality, not a denial of it.
In the words of Thomas Jefferson, “If a state expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.”
"Pot Patriotism Plus Jury Nullification Equals US vs. Heicklen"
by Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director
George Washington University law professor and longtime jury nullification proponent Paul Butler pens a noteworthy op-ed in yesterday’s New York Times.
Notable not only because of the important subject matter vis-à-vis the first example proffered by Professor Butler, but also too because of the defendant in the case at bar cited.
Professor Julian Heicklen has been protesting Cannabis Prohibition laws since the mid 1990s, mainly around the Penn State campus where he was a longtime Chemistry professor, principally by causing a ruckus around jury nullification and protesting without permits.
Here is a related story NORML featured about Prof. Heicklen in 1998.
Well, to his ever-loving credit, in his retirement, this 79-year-old freedom loving activist is still–through his own pain and suffering–working hard to inform the public and potential jurors that they (better said, we) all have the right to vote our conscience when in judgment of our fellow citizens in a criminal court of law.
I too join Professors Heicklen and Butler in what some prosecutors deem a ‘crime’ and that is to educate as many citizens as possible that they don’t have to keep upholding bad laws like Cannabis Prohibition by voting to punish citizens for non-violent cannabis-related criminal offenses.
American citizens when acting as jurors have the right and responsibility to “Just Say No” to enforcing the country’s failed and expensive Cannabis Prohibition laws.
Many thanks to John Peter Zenger, Julian Heicklen, Paul Butler and all citizens who fully exercise their rights to nullify bad laws.
On December 15, 2011, Sen. Kohl-Welles sent a summary of her proposed legislation. She is seeking
feedback from the medical cannabis community by December 22, 2011. Her email address is jeanne.kohl-welles@leg.wa.gov
Collective garden restrictions
Amends the section which authorizes collective gardens
Membership in gardens is limited to patients and designated providers. Patients and providers
may only be a member of one collective garden;
Collective gardens may have a maximum of 10 members and the membership period must be
for at least 5 days;
Members may produce, process, transport, or deliver cannabis for the medical use of its
members;
Plant and useable cannabis limits at set at 15 plants per member up to a total of 45 plants and
24 ounces of cannabis per member up to a total of 72 ounces;
Contributions of patients and providers may not be solely monetary;
Only one garden is allowed per tax parcel;
Local governments may impose zoning, licensing, permitting, and health and safety
requirements, taxes, fees, or other conditions upon a collection garden but such regulation may
not preclude the siting of collective gardens within that jurisdiction;
A copy of each member's valid documentation or registration card and proof of identity must be
available on the premises.
Nonprofit patient cooperatives
Permits nonprofit patient cooperatives (NPCs) providing counties, cities and towns with opt-in and
opt-out options
Counties (and the cities within those counties) with a population of less than 200,000 are
permitted to opt-in. NPCs will not be permitted unless such jurisdictions allow by ordinance;
Counties (and the cities within those counties) with a population of 200,000 or more are
permitted to opt-out. NPCs will be permitted in these jurisdictions unless they agree to prohibit
them by ordinance. The population number is copied from the pilot project language in SB 5955;
If local jurisdictions allow NPCs they may impose zoning, licensing, permitting, and health and
safety requirements, taxes, fees, or other conditions upon a NPC. Local jurisdictions may also set
limits on the number of members.
NPCs must:
Be registered with the secretary of state as nonprofit corporations;
Limit membership to qualifying patients or their designated providers;
Confirm that a nonregistered patient qualifies for the medical use of cannabis by contacting the
authorizing health care professional's office;
Comply with plant and useable cannabis limits
o 15 plants per member up to a total of 99 plants
o 24 ounces of useable cannabis per member up to a total of 144 ounces
Make available on the premises a copy of each member's valid documentation or registration
card and proof of identity;
Only deliver cannabis to members;
Not permit cannabis to be consumed on the premises;
Ensure that cannabis cannot be viewed from outside the facility;
Not be located within 500 feet of community centers, child care centers, or schools. Local
governments can increase/decrease this requirement;
Not advertise to the general public in any manner that promotes the use of cannabis. This
prohibition does not apply to advertising in medical marijuana trade journals and on medical
marijuana websites;
Set the price of cannabis and membership fees at a rate that only covers expenses. Fees may be
adjusted based on individual consumption rates and level of participation in the NPC;
Allow only members or staff of the NPC to be on the premises except that NPCs may periodically
allow media and government officials to visit the NPC;
Be independent facilities, unaffiliated with other NPCs. NPCs can have multiple locations but
plant and usable cannabis limits cannot exceed what’s allowable for that one NPC;
Permit local government employees to access records while engaged in their official duties.
NPCs may:
Produce cannabis and/or obtain cannabis from collective gardens (subject to plant and useable
cannabis limits);
Hire staff to assist in operating the NPC or use member volunteers;
Staff is provided with an affirmative defense unless they are patients or designated providers
who are registered.
Members of a NPC may:
Only be a member of one NPC at a time;
Volunteer or work for a NPC but are not required to do so;
Also be a member of a collective garden if that garden produces cannabis for the NPC (patients
and providers can only be a member of one collective garden and one NPC).
Medical cannabis registry
Establishes a voluntary registry within the Department of Health (DOH)
Patients and providers who are registered and in compliance with state law are provided with
arrest protection;
Patients and providers who are not registered may assert an affirmative defense if they
otherwise comply with the law;
DOH must adopt rules relating to the creation, implementation, maintenance, and upgrading of
the registry. This process will be guided by a stakeholder advisory committee;
DOH may contract out the operation of the registry;
Law enforcement may only access the registry in connection with a specific legitimate criminal
investigation;
Before seeking an arrest warrant law enforcement must make reasonable efforts to ascertain
whether the person under investigation is registered;
Personally identifiable information must be nonreversible, not susceptible to linkage, and
subject to current best differential privacy practices;
Registration cards must be issued on tamper resistant paper.
Other provisions
Removes obsolete references to licensed dispensaries, etc.,
Allows for the taxation of the medical use of cannabis until it is rescheduled;
Modifies the Washington State Institute for Public Policy study to focus on activities of local
governments;
Requires cannabis exceeding a total of 24 ounces to be transported in a locked metal box that is
bolted to the transporting vehicle unless it is being transported by a patient or provider and is
for the personal medical use of the patient or the provider's patient;
Prohibits law enforcement from discriminating against non-registered patients;
Exempts records containing names and other personally identifiable information relating to
patients, providers, collective gardens and NPCs from the public records act.
Disallows conviction of DUI for qualifying patients based solely on the presence, or presence in a
certain concentration, of components or metabolites of cannabis. Proof of actual impairment is
required.
Rep. Barney Frank Educates George Will and Paul Ryan on Marijuana Legalization
Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), the primary sponsor of HR 2306: The Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2011, appeared on ‘This Week with Christiane Amanpour’ on ABC with fellow guests George Will of the Washington Post and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI).
The conversation found its way to marijuana legalization which led to Barney Frank calling out the hypocrisy of most of his conservative colleagues.
“It’s a great embarrassment to the conservatives,” said Frank, “They want to tell people who they can have sex with. Come on, all this is big government! Who can I have sex with? Who can I marry? What can I read? What can I smoke? You guys, on the whole — not all of you — but the conservatives are the ones who intrude on personal liberty there.”
The debate got heated between Frank and George Will. “I mean, personal liberty, if someone wants to smoke marijuana who’s an adult, why do you want to make them go to jail?” Frank questioned.
“I need to know more about whether it’s a gateway drug to other drugs, I need to know how you’re going to regulate it,” George Will replied.
“Anything is a gateway to anything,” Representative Frank shot back, “That’s the slippery slope argument which is a very anti-libertarian argument. The fact that if somebody is doing something that’s not in itself wrong, that it might lead later on to something else then stop the something else. Don’t lock them up for smoking marijuana.”
Will defended himself claiming, “What you’re calling a cop-out, I’m calling a quest for information.”
“How long’s it going to last, George?” Frank asked, “We’ve been doing this for decades.”
Washington state kicked off its effort to sign up uninsured residents for health insurance through a new federal law at a Tuesday meeting in Seattle....
Leave a comment: