420 Use and Health

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Crow
    replied
    Seattle, Washington (US)

    Smokin' Oldies: Colombian Weed Returns To Puget Sound

    by Steve Elliot, Seattle Weekly (blog)

    The ascendancy of medical-marijuana culture has made available an intoxicating array of cannabis strains from across the planet. Squat, potent indicas from the steppes of Afghanistan, towering sativas from the Thai highlands, and a million hybrids in between add up to a dizzying array of choices for the discerning patient.

    Strain collectors have sought to preserve the genetic legacy of dozens of landrace cannabis plants from around the globe. Which means weed-culture phenoms whose names sound like a recitation of the '70s Greatest Ganja Hits -- including legendary strains like Panama Red and Colombian -- are making a comeback.

    Of course, talk is cheap and names are expensive. In the absence of DNA matching, objective verification of a strain's genetic authenticity is all but impossible.

    Some of us old-timers, though, were around the last time Colombian hit the scene, and that gives us a baseline from which to work. (The last time I saw it was around 1980 or 1981.) That's the reason I wanted to try the Colombian sativa at Puget Sound Health Alternatives, which opened September 1 at the edge of Queen Anne and Interbay.

    I'd taken a wait-and-see attitude after seeing the 'Lombo listed on PSHA's online menu at WeedMaps.com. I later found out that the evocative description had been penned by none other than co-owner Tim, who was budtending on the recent Sunday I visited. "All you old-time smokers will travel down the slippery slope of memory when you smoke this one-of-a-kind gem," it read. "Musky and sweet. The high is long and strong."

    When Tim actually showed me the Colombian sativa buds, they weren't the big donkey-dong flowers you see in High Times centerfolds--though PSHA did have plenty of those, in other strains. But what they lacked in size they made up for in trichomes and the promised sweet, musky smell.

    But the truth is in the toking, so I happily made a 50-buck donation to try an eighth. My skepticism was soon shaken, because this weed does have the cerebral solidity of old-time Colombian, along with the ineffable sativa headrush that inspired a million late-night album marathons.

    Nausea? Poof. Anxiety? Poof. Even pain was set back on its heels by this strain--and that doesn't always happen with sativas. (Now if I can just fight off this unhealthy yearning for Blue Öyster Cult . . . )

    PSHA also had some powerful indicas, including Pineapple and Shiska Berry, for a donation of $15 per gram and $50 per eighth. (Very good $10 strains of both sativa and indica varieties are available--in fact, PSHA had some of the more spectacular $10 flowers I've ever seen.) Pineapple had a deliciously sweet taste and a satisfying wallop of pain relief and body stone. My stunned thought processes slowed to a leisurely, pleasurable crawl whilst I took an indica-inspired mental vacation.


    Puget Sound Health Alternatives has plenty of parking and is open 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Saturday and noon to 6 p.m. Sunday at the crossroads of 15th and Dravus at 3202 15th Ave. W., 402-5082, e-mail info@pugetsoundhealthalternatives.com, website pugetsoundhealthalternatives.com.

    Could it really be Colombian after all these years? The Toke test says yes.

    Article: http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/daily...ian_weed_r.php

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    United States

    'Feds To Grant Exclusive Cannabinoid License To Pharma Firm'

    The U.S. federal government's Department of Health and Human Services seems about ready to award exclusive rights to apply marijuana as a medical therapeutic. You read that correctly: "exclusive rights."

    Now, I don't think of myself as a conspiracy theorist. But when the federal government keeps taking actions that, even when considered separately but especially when viewed together, all seem to be part of a bigger plan to pave the way for the pharmaceutical industry to bulldoze the cottage medical marijuana industry, I start getting antsy.

    "We find it hypocritical and incredible that on the one hand, the U.S. Department of Justice is persecuting cannabis patient associations, asserting that the federal government regards marijuana as having absolutely no medical value, despite overwhelming clinical evidence," said Union of Medical Marijuana Patients director James Shaw. "On the other hand, the Department of Health and Human Services is planning to grant patent rights with possible worldwide application to develop medicine based on cannabis."

    "Though UMMP welcomes any potential new research that could come from KannaLife Sciences' federal endorsement, it is highly disconcerting that the contemplated grant is an exclusive one," the organization posted on its website.
    Article continued at: http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2011/12...nse_to_pha.php

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Great. Just what I need right now... A 'group of patients' trying to stifle reform:

    ------------------------------

    Seattle, Washington (US)

    Patients challenge Seattle marijuana rules

    By Gene Johnson, Associated Press

    SEATTLE — A group of patients sued to block new medical marijuana regulations in Seattle on Wednesday, saying cities in Washington have no authority to impose such rules.

    The lawsuit filed in King County Superior Court sets up a legal fight over whether cities can take steps to regulate marijuana providers, following Gov. Chris Gregoire's veto of a bill that would have set up a system of state-licensed dispensaries.

    Seattle is one of seven cities in Washington that have passed rules governing collective gardens since the veto. Others have imposed moratoriums forbidding the gardens from operating or providing marijuana to patients.

    Seattle's City Council last summer approved rules requiring medical marijuana businesses to follow the same rules as any other businesses - obtain a license, pay taxes, follow land use and historical preservation codes, and follow safe food-handling guidelines. Mayor Mike McGinn signed the bill.


    Douglas Hiatt, the Seattle medical marijuana lawyer who filed the lawsuit, said Wednesday that the state has not granted local governments in Washington the authority to impose rules governing medical marijuana, and that furthermore, requiring dispensaries to obtain a business license forces them to incriminate themselves. Washington's medical marijuana law, passed by voters in 1998, didn't make marijuana legal - it just allows patients to present a defense if they're charged with possession in state court.

    "I told the City Council that if they passed this I would sue them, because they don't have the power to do this," Hiatt said. "I'm keeping my promise."

    The Seattle city attorney's office would defend the law but has no further comment, spokeswoman Kimberly Mills said.

    Kurt Boehl, a criminal defense attorney who worked closely with the city attorney's office to draft Seattle's ordinance, said he was disappointed.

    "I don't see how suing the city helps patients," Boehl said. "We found a city that was willing to work with patients, to work with the medical marijuana community, and this is a slap in the face."

    He argued that cities have inherent authority to regulate businesses that are open to the public in their jurisdiction. The business licensing requirement does not actually force dispensaries to incriminate themselves - at least not under state law, which allows for patient-to-patient transfers of marijuana, he said. He conceded that it requires the business owners to incriminate themselves under federal law, but he said he doubted if anyone had ever been investigated or prosecuted on that basis.


    Issaquah, Mukilteo, Shoreline, Ellensburg, Gig Harbor and Castle Rock also have regulations governing collective gardens, according to Philip Dawdy, of the Washington Alternative Medicine Alliance. Several other cities, including Tacoma, are considering them.

    "I have to ask why a longtime advocate for safe access to cannabis turns around and sues the principal city that has been able to provide safe access," Dawdy said of Hiatt. "What the city did was brave and heroic, and I don't know who's being hurt by these regulations."

    Hiatt insisted there are problems with the regulations and with the state's medical marijuana law that need to be sorted out by the courts.

    "Putting your head in the stand and pretending the problem doesn't exist doesn't make it go away," he said. "What I am trying to do is establish what the law is, what it can be and what people's rights are."
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...mid=obinsource

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Seattle, Washington (US)

    Lawsuit filed over Seattle's medical-marijuana ordinance

    by Jonathan Martin, Seattle Times

    Seattle's effort to bring medical-marijuana dispensaries under the wing of city ordinance was challenged as unconstitutional Wednesday on grounds it would require an admission of illegal activity.

    A lawsuit, filed by longtime marijuana defense attorney Douglas Hiatt, accuses the city of legal hypocrisy by requiring dispensary owners to get licenses, pay taxes and abide by zoning laws while the city is also enforcing drug-nuisance laws.

    The lawsuit exposes intrafamily fighting among marijuana-legalization advocates Seattle City attorney Pete Holmes, whose office championed the ordinance, and Hiatt, who views most regulation as de-facto admission that operating a marijuana dispensary is a federal crime.

    "I think a lot of people are being misled" into thinking the city's ordinance protects dispensary owners, Hiatt said. "Those are all admissions of guilt in federal prosecution, and even in state prosecution."

    Seattle's ordinance, passed in July, was the first municipal attempt in the state to regulate the medical-marijuana dispensaries that have blossomed — with an estimated 80 in Seattle alone — over the past several years.

    Among the 16 states allowing medical marijuana, Washington has one of the most chaotic regulatory schemes because a bill in the 2010 Legislature to legalize and regulate dispensaries was mostly vetoed by Gov. Chris Gregoire.

    She allowed municipalities to go their own way, resulting in patchwork local regulation, which funneled so-called "pot shops" into the most progressive cities.

    "It's unfortunate that the most tolerant city in the state has been singled out for trying to do the right thing," Holmes said.

    Philip Dawdy, spokesman for medical-marijuana trade group Washington Alternative Medicine Alliance, said the lawsuit undermines efforts by Holmes and Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn, who also is an advocate of marijuana legalization.

    "Hiatt should be thanking them. Instead, he's suing," said Dawdy.

    Since July, at least six municipalities have followed Seattle's lead and passed ordinances intended to treat dispensaries like other businesses.

    Kurt Boehl, a Seattle attorney who represents dispensaries, said those ordinances helped to make legitimate patients' access to marijuana safer. "I don't know of anyone in the industry that has been harmed by legitimate regulation."
    Jonathan Martin: 206-464-2605 or jmartin@seattletimes.com. On Twitter @jmartin206.

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...ijuana15m.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    United States (Politics)

    Gingrich Proposed the Death Penalty for Pot Smokers -- Even Though He Admitted to Smoking it Himself

    Newt Gingrich proposed the death penalty for marijuana in 1997, and yet he is one of the 100 million Americans who have smoked marijuana.

    Over the weekend, struggling Republican presidential candidate Gary Johnson reminded MSNBC viewers that GOP frontrunner Newt Gingrich had once to called to punish some drug offenders with death.

    “Newt Gingrich, in 1997, proposed the death penalty for marijuana — for possession of marijuana above a certain quantity of marijuana,” Johnson explained. “And yet, he is among 100 million Americans who’ve smoked marijuana.”

    “I would love to have a discussion with him on the fact that he smoked pot, and under the wrong set of circumstance he proposed the death penalty for, potentially, something that he had committed. I have troubles with that,” he added.

    Johnson, a former New Mexico governor who has advocated for marijuana legalization since 1999, is at least partially correct about Gingrich’s position.

    As Speaker of the House, Gingrich introducedthe “Drug Importer Death Penalty Act of 1996.”

    The bill would have required a “sentence of death for certain importations of significant quantities of controlled substances.” It would have applied to anyone convicted more than once of carrying 100 doses — or about two ounces — of marijuana across the border. Defendants would have had a window of 18 months to file their one and only appeal.
    Continued at http://www.alternet.org/drugs/153414...ing_it_himself

    Leave a comment:


  • snusjus
    replied
    Originally posted by SmokedEuro
    I can easily see alcohol being more dangerous and causing more problems and thats legal.
    You are correct:

    Marijuana is not linked to any form of cancer (including the lungs and throat). Alcohol is linked to a plethora of cancers (notably of the liver, which has a very low survival rate).
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...052501729.html

    Marijuana does not cause violent behavior. Alcohol is involved in the majority of domestic violence cases.
    Cannabis reduces likelihood of violence during intoxication… Source: Hoaken, Peter N.S., Sherry H. Stewart. Journal of Addictive Behaviors. 28, pages 1533-1554. Drugs of abuse and the elicitation of human aggressive behavior. Dept. of Psychology, University of Western Ontario. Dept. of of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University.

    Marijuana is less addictive than caffeine. Alcohol is nearly as addictive as heroin.
    http://www.procon.org/view.backgroun...esourceID=1492

    I'd gladly trade in my heavy-drinking habits for marijuana dependency. Haha.

    Leave a comment:


  • SmokedEuro
    replied
    Originally posted by snusjus
    People are still getting prosecuted for marijuana possession? Humanity continues to astonish me.
    And the fines/charges are ridiculous. I had a bowl one that was probably half done. Got caught, (fast fwd to the end), $450 in fines and a violation on my record. Or i could've gotten a lawyer paid him/her 1k, still had the fine but would've gotten the violation dropped.

    Leave us stoners alone. We don't hurt anyone.

    I can easily see alcohol being more dangerous and causing more problems and thats legal. I just dont get it

    Leave a comment:


  • SmokedEuro
    replied
    Originally posted by sirloot
    when the dummies consent to a search
    Ive tried that non-consent thing. Around here that immediately turns into probable cause. Then next thing you know more cops are pulling up, your being searched and cuffed for their "Safety" and they are tossing your car anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • snusjus
    replied
    People are still getting prosecuted for marijuana possession? Humanity continues to astonish me.

    Leave a comment:


  • sirloot
    replied
    Originally posted by SmokedEuro
    of course, idiots. I would love to know what they did to turn it from a traffic stop into a searching. Maybe its in the link, maybe I should read that lol.
    when the dummies consent to a search

    Leave a comment:


  • SmokedEuro
    replied
    Originally posted by BadAxe
    And dude will still scream that he got screwed by the man. LOL
    of course, idiots. I would love to know what they did to turn it from a traffic stop into a searching. Maybe its in the link, maybe I should read that lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • BadAxe
    replied
    And dude will still scream that he got screwed by the man. LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    'Officer, can I have my weed back?'

    BEAVER, Pa. -- A defense attorney's argument that a bag of marijuana uncovered during a Pennsylvania traffic stop could have belonged to a man other than his client unraveled after an arresting officer recalled the suspect asking him: "Can I have my weed back?"

    Nineteen-year-old Devonte Davon Jeter was one of four men in a car stopped by Midland police on May 13.

    Jeter's attorney said Monday that the marijuana could have belonged to any one of the men in the car.

    But the prosecutor told the judge: "I don't know what else 'Can I have my weed back?' can mean, other than it's his."

    The Beaver County Times reports that a district judge agreed with the prosecutor and ordered Jeter to stand trial on marijuana possession charges.

    http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/20...e-my-weed-back

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    Massachusetts (US)

    "Marijuana Law Reform Marching On: Legalization Highly Favored In New Massachusetts Poll"

    58% support in Massachusetts for legalizing marijuana and regulating it as other agricultural commodities

    Georgetown, MA – This evening, attendees at the Second Annual Massachusetts Cannabis Convention hosted by the Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition/NORML (MassCann/NORML) at the Crowne Plaza in Natick heard the major results of a live telephone poll conducted in November by DAPA Research Inc. of 600 Massachusetts voters with a margin of error of +/-4%.

    The most significant findings:

    *Fifty-eight percent (58%) support legalizing marijuana and regulating it in the same manner as other agricultural commodities with sales prohibited to underage persons (69% Democrats, 44% Republicans, 54% Other).

    *Sixty-two percent (62%) are more likely to support legalization if the proposed law would regulate the cultivation and sale of marijuana to adults and tax it in the same manner as the state currently regulates alcohol (70% Democrats, 56% Republicans, 60% Other).

    *Fifty-four percent (54%) oppose the federal government disregarding state law in states legalizing marijuana, while only 35% support the federal government’s disregarding state law.

    “The data strongly suggests that Massachusetts voters are more ready than voters in any other state to end prohibition and establish reasonable regulation of cannabis cultivation and commerce for all purposes,” said Steven S. Epstein, a founder and currently an officer of MassCann/NORML. “The data also establishes that if the legislature does not enact a law allowing medical use of marijuana this session the voters will overwhelmingly, perhaps 80%+, approve the voter initiative for the Humanitarian Medical Use of Marijuana at the ballot box in November.”

    “Legalization is essential to ending crime created by the prohibition of cannabis,” said Cara Crabb-Burnham, a member of MassCann/NORML’s Board of Directors. “It is important to recognize legal vendors will card customers and keep it out of the hands of children."
    For more information contact:

    Michael Crawford, 978-502-4080
    Attorney Steven Epstein, 978-352-3300

    http://blog.norml.org/2011/12/10/mar...chusetts-poll/

    Leave a comment:


  • Crow
    replied
    California (US)

    5-year-old suffering from seizures is treated with medical cannabis

    On Thursday night, the Discovery Channel's controversial reality show "Weed Wars" became even more controversial when a father administered medical marijuana to his five-year-old son in an attempt to ease his seizures.

    According to "Weed Wars," Jason has tried to soothe his son Jayden's hour-long seizures since he was four months old. But after finding little success from traditional medication, Jason desperately turned to Harborside Health Center, a medical marijuana dispensary in Oakland and the focus of the Discovery Channel reality show.
    "I'm not trying to get my son high," said Jason on the segment. "I'm trying to cure my son's seizures."

    In the episode, Jason administered a tincture of medical cannabinoid (CBD) orally with little resistance from Jayden. The CBD tincture he used was non-intoxicating, meaning that Jayden should not have felt any side affect or high.

    But with loaded controversy surrounding the use of medical marijuana, critics are sure to be outraged anyway.

    Since airing this fall, "Weed Wars" has aimed to shed light on the medical marijuana industry and dispel the myths and stereotypes that might surround it. The medical marijuana war is one that Harborside Health Care has battled for years, and the center drew national attention when it was hit with a $2.4 million tax bill from the IRS last October.

    "What kind of drug trafficking organization actually files a tax return? None of them do," said Harborside CEO Steve DeAngelo to The Huffington Post. "The very fact that we filed a tax return and told the IRS all the details of what we are doing proves we are not a drug trafficking organization."

    Harborside is certainly testing the limits of public acceptance with the recent episode, but DeAngelo claims that establishing trust is essential to the cause. In an article titled "Don't Call it Pot" in the New York Times, DeAngelo explained that maintaining a safe and legitimate environment is the cornerstone of the organization. "We want to make it safe, seemly and responsible," he said. "If we can't demonstrate professionalism and legitimacy, we're never going to gain the trust of our citizens," said DeAngelo. "And without that trust, we're never going to get to where we need to go."

    Watch a clip of Jayden in Thursday's episode of "Weed Wars" below:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...n_1140351.html

    Leave a comment:

Related Topics

Collapse

Working...
X