Snus 'worse than smoking' for infant apnea

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • EricHill78
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 4253

    #1

    Snus 'worse than smoking' for infant apnea

    I was googling "kosher snus" just out of curiosity ha, and this article came up. So Desirexe or any of the other ladies here somethin to think about.

    Snus 'worse than smoking' for infant apnea

    Published: 1 Sep 11 12:59 CET

    Infants born to mothers who used moist snuff or 'snus' while pregnant are at a greater risk of suffering from apnea than children whose mothers merely smoked during gestation, a new Swedish study shows.

    Scientists studied the incidence of apnea, a temporary suspension of breathing, among 610,000 Swedish infants born between 1999 and 2006.

    The study revealed that the risk of apnea is 50 percent higher for children of smoking mothers than from children of mothers who neither smoked nor used snuff during pregnancy.

    However, in stark contrast,the risk is twice as large for children whose mothers use the smokeless oral tobacco product while pregnant.

    Research director Anna Gunnerberck with the Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm told the Reutuers news agency, that snuff, which is often considered by many to be less harmful than cigarettes during pregnancy, is not a good option when considering the health of the unborn child.

    ”It may have a slightly different effect than smoking but it is still not safe during pregnancy,” she said.

    Researchers wrote that it is likely that nicotine patches and nicotine gum also increase the risk of apnea in the child and that these products should not be considered an alternative to smoking for expectant mothers.

    Apnea in infants can lead to sleep disturbances and make them more vulnerable to infection.

    Although it's perfectly normal for everyone to experience occasional pauses in breathing, this unexplained cessation of breathing can become a problem when breathing stops for 20 seconds or longer.

    The study is published in the Pediatrics journal.

    http://m.thelocal.se/35898/20110901/
  • spirit72
    Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 1013

    #2
    Yeah, it seems there's just not a workaround for pregnancy that doesn't carry its own risks. Just gotta bite the bullet.....

    Comment

    • Frosted
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 5798

      #3
      I don't know a single person who'se child was in any way disabled or ill as a result of their mothers smoking through their pregnancy - and I know quite a few. It was the norm when I was born - my own mother used to smoke and smoked through both the pregnancies (mind you, my brother was born with 6 toes (true)).



      maybe I failed in the argument with that bit at the end there.

      Comment

      • precious007
        Banned Users
        • Sep 2010
        • 5885

        #4
        Originally posted by Frosted
        I don't know a single person who'se child was in any way disabled or ill as a result of their mothers smoking through their pregnancy - and I know quite a few. It was the norm when I was born - my own mother used to smoke and smoked through both the pregnancies (mind you, my brother was born with 6 toes (true)).



        maybe I failed in the argument with that bit at the end there.
        If you don't know that doesn't mean the child won't develop a disease through their adulthood or later in their life.

        I was born at 7 months and 890 grams because my mom used to smoke, just a particular case, but there are more severe cases I bet, I mean the baby ingests all the 4000 chemicals...... I'm talking large scale here... not about just a few people I or you know....

        Comment

        • Frosted
          Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 5798

          #5
          Originally posted by precious007
          If you don't know that doesn't mean the child won't develop a disease through their adulthood or later in their life.

          I was born at 7 months and 890 grams because my mom used to smoke, just a particular case, but there are more severe cases I bet, I mean the baby ingests all the 4000 chemicals...... I'm talking large scale here... not about just a few people I or you know....


          I wasn't exactly being serious or scientific (thought that was obvious)

          Comment

          • ABW
            Member
            • May 2011
            • 793

            #6
            Originally posted by Frosted
            I wasn't exactly being serious or scientific (thought that was obvious)


            Thank god..

            Comment

            • Frosted
              Member
              • Mar 2010
              • 5798

              #7
              ABW!!! Haven't met your asshole self for ages. Shame you're still alive.

              Amongst all the beligerent pricks of this forum I thought Govegan would be the first dick to answer.

              In fact, the amount of ignorant cretins on this forum is growing. Are you all breeding by f***ing each other.

              Comment

              • truthwolf1
                Member
                • Oct 2008
                • 2696

                #8
                Nothing beats CRACK!

                Comment

                • ABW
                  Member
                  • May 2011
                  • 793

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Frosted
                  ABW!!! Haven't met your asshole self for ages. Shame you're still alive.

                  Amongst all the beligerent pricks of this forum I thought Govegan would be the first dick to answer.

                  In fact, the amount of ignorant cretins on this forum is growing. Are you all breeding by f***ing each other.

                  As always your a shining beckon for the British people... Glad I could be the first to smack your dumbass comment to the floor..

                  Comment

                  • Premium Parrots
                    Super Moderators
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 9761

                    #10
                    Originally posted by spirit72
                    Yeah, it seems there's just not a workaround for pregnancy that doesn't carry its own risks. Just gotta bite the bullet.....
                    Theres quite a wonderfull workaround for pregnancy that carries no risks. Instead of biteing the "bullet" have her suck on it.

                    Theres no way she could get preggo then.
                    Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of the people I killed because they were annoying......





                    I've been wrong lots of times.  Lots of times I've thought I was wrong only to find out that I was right in the beginning.


                    Comment

                    • Roo
                      Member
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 3446

                      #11
                      Frosted's drunk

                      Comment

                      • GoVegan
                        Member
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 5603

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Roo
                        Frosted's drunk
                        The bad part is that he is probably at work tight now.

                        Comment

                        Related Topics

                        Collapse

                        Working...
                        X