The 9-11 attacks and a recent report recorded in April 2009

[justintempler]

Penn & Teller - 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

[Royksprekk]

I love Penn and Teller.

[HK11]

This building in china never fell as a result of explosions and fire. Those chinese are good with the building, apparently.

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/as...e/#cnnSTCVideo

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/as...e/#cnnSTCPhoto

Im not saying it had to be an inside job, but buildings dont melt into liquid metal flowing around under the streets for weeks from a normal fire. Apparently jet fuel isnt able to get that hot.

An uncle of mine who works in demolition turned me on to this whole thing. He certainly doesnt buy the planes theory. Im still undecided but there are a lot of strange facts. The debunkers all have debunkers that have debunkers.

[Messiah]

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse....i?u=911_morons

my favorite site on the subject.

[truthwolf1]

Great find Slydel!

I started researching this topic in 2005 after I heard that a missle hit the Pentagon at some party and wanted to disprove it. In starting that research I was instantly sucked into a vortex of theories from all angles about 911 that lasted years. There are numerous facts that just do not add up but also quite a few that are easily debunked.

Most eveyone I know has questions about that day and I do believe there should be new independent investigation.

[justintempler]

Niels harrit debunked 1/3


Niels harrit debunked 2/3


Niels harrit debunked 3/3

[justintempler]

This building in china never fell as a result of explosions and fire. Those chinese are good with the building, apparently.

http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm

Im not saying it had to be an inside job, but buildings dont melt into liquid metal flowing around under the streets for weeks from a normal fire. Apparently jet fuel isnt able to get that hot.

http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm#molten

[justintempler]

The conspiracy behind...... the conspiracy..... behind the conspiracy

The Danish Article
Chefredaktør skrider efter kontroversiel artikel om 9/11

The Google Translation
Editor in Chief resigns after a controversial article on 9 / 11

The only reason they chose "The Open Chemical Physics Journal" to publish in was because they were able to get it into the publication without getting it approved by the editor. The only "peer review" involved was done by it's co-authors. Under those circumstances they could have published an article that said the moon was made of green cheese if they had wanted to.

And those dust samples were supplied by Steven Jones (911 conspiracy theorist) who obtained the dust samples after 9/11 from "concerned" citizens. (conflict of interest and questionable source of the material tested.)

This "new" evidence is totally worthless. I'm done posting on this thread. Enjoy your conspiracy.

[HK11]

Like I said before. Even the debunkers have debunkers. There are nuts on both sides.

[Badfish74]

This "new" evidence is totally worthless. I'm done posting on this thread. Enjoy your conspiracy.

Afraid to believe? Me thinks so! Notice the word evidence wasn't in quotes. Does this mean that he does in fact concede that it is evidence?

[HK11]

CRACKPOTS!


<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/w41tHo0pZE8&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&featu re=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed>

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMI6LTXEH6Q&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&featu re=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed>

[HK11]

One more for the lulz, and im done

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fxfz6Ma1fI8&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&featu re=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed>

[lxskllr]

The fun thing about conspiracies is they all rely on information the "average" person isn't privy to. There's always extenuating circumstances that can't be proven due to the "conspiracy".

One thing I've learned in my 40 years on this planet, is that people are generally too stupid to keep a secret. One person? Maybe, if they have decent self control. As soon as you add other people, the odds of the "secret" being kept drop exponentially as the group grows.

[Messiah]

I like how everyone talks about fire and jet fuel, but ignores the fact that the structure was hit by a ****ing plane!

[dEFinitionofEPIC]

I am the type of person that bbelieves that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and should not be called idiots just because of differing opinions. BUT I also believe that those who won't even entertain the notion that the American government had something to do with the 9-11 attacks are either closed minded sheep blindly following radical right wingists like Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity or are so afraid of the fact that our beloved government might actually be lying to us *gasps in astonishment* that they bury their heads in the sand and refuse to consider a different point of view. This being said, if you do believe the government then you also believe that they are so incompetent that they allowed 19 Iraqi terrorists armed with box cutters and fake bombs to cirumvent our entire National Security System! So what are they, dishonest or bumbling boobs? And how exactly did going after these alleged Al Qaeda terrorists lead us to Iraq to find non-existant weapons of mass destruction?

let the sheeple be sheeple man... there are some people you just can't get through to. Whenever truth is exposed the people behind the scenes will always come up with an extravagant counter to it. Most people seem to bite on the counter propaganda because it is beyond them to not trust the system... Sheeple like templer are the reason why we are slowly slipping into a socialist new world order. Unfortunately for the real truth finders most people are like this....