Help for those in banned states.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lxskllr
    Member
    • Sep 2007
    • 13435

    #61
    "Come in here, Dear boy, have a cigar.
    You're gonna go far,
    You're gonna fly high,
    You're never gonna die,
    You're gonna make it, if you try;"

    Comment

    • LaZeR
      Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 3994

      #62
      Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
      "Come in here, Dear boy, have a cigar.
      You're gonna go far,
      You're gonna fly high,
      You're never gonna die,
      You're gonna make it, if you try;"

      Comment

      • amdusias
        Member
        • Jul 2009
        • 265

        #63
        I like Primus' cover

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTgAiQvdWOE

        Comment

        • amdusias
          Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 265

          #64
          For those in Iowa, I have the number to the Tobacco Control Division if you have any questions. 515-281-6225

          Comment

          • snusgetter
            Member
            • May 2010
            • 10903

            #65
            New info

            Originally posted by snusgetter View Post
            I called a UPS Store in RI and found out something interesting:

            You don't even have to get a PO Box ($105/yr for a small box!!);
            they have package pickup for $3.00 and they'll even sign for your package.
            Great for the occasional parcel! You'll have to make sure your CC
            company has the UPS Store authorized on your card as a shipping
            address, though.

            I'd call an accessible/closest UPS Store in the next state over and get
            all the details; I think these are franchises (Ă  la Mailbox Etc) so there
            may be some policy variances.

            I'm still searching for the applicable statute but Fredrik says:
            Mass. law states that a web shop must also have a brick and mortar store of the same name within the state lines, before selling online.
            I don't really doubt it but how do Amazon, QVC, etc, get away
            with it -- they don't have B&Ms. Unless Taxachusetts has put
            such a provision into their lame tax law. Something to look into;
            could be something for the ACLU??

            Comment

            • FINALBOSS
              Member
              • Jun 2010
              • 37

              #66
              Originally posted by snusgetter View Post
              I'm still searching for the applicable statute but Fredrik says:
              I don't really doubt it but how do Amazon, QVC, etc, get away
              with it -- they don't have B&Ms. Unless Taxachusetts has put
              such a provision into their lame tax law. Something to look into;
              could be something for the ACLU??
              This is ****ing bullshit.

              I've STILL been googling for the last day and I still haven't found a SINGLE mention of smokeless tobacco being banned from shipping to Massachusetts.

              Northerner needs to get off his ****ing ass and fix this shit. It's starting to piss me off.

              Comment

              • snusgetter
                Member
                • May 2010
                • 10903

                #67
                Originally posted by FINALBOSS View Post
                I've STILL been googling for the last day and I still haven't found a SINGLE mention of smokeless tobacco being banned from shipping to Massachusetts.
                Likewise...
                When I think I find something on the state's website, my
                mind feels like it's on a rollercoaster ride; and my eyesight
                has dwindled to the point I'm getting cross-eyed. I wonder
                if there's a federal handout to combat PACT fatigue?


                HERE'S LOOKING AT YOU, CONGRESSSLUT!!

                ...Click image for larger version

Name:	49021_11_20_2007_7_&.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	74.5 KB
ID:	595380

                Comment

                • sgreger1
                  Member
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 9451

                  #68
                  Just start wrapping snus in tobacco leaves and label them cigars. Aren't cigars still legal? Claim your an indian or something lol.

                  Comment

                  • danielan
                    Member
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 1514

                    #69
                    Pipe tobacco seems to be "legal" too...

                    Isn't JT making snus out of pipe tobacco?

                    Comment

                    • lxskllr
                      Member
                      • Sep 2007
                      • 13435

                      #70
                      Originally posted by FINALBOSS View Post
                      This is ****ing bullshit.

                      I've STILL been googling for the last day and I still haven't found a SINGLE mention of smokeless tobacco being banned from shipping to Massachusetts.

                      Northerner needs to get off his ****ing ass and fix this shit. It's starting to piss me off.

                      Other Provisions
                      It shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice for any manufacturer, distributor or retailer to engage in the distribution of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco products through the mail, including redemption of coupons, credits and proofs-of-purchase. Exempts mail-order sales, excluding mail-order redemption of coupons and distribution of free samples through the mail, that are subject to age verification. Verification of age through the mail shall consist of, at a minimum, ensuring that the person to whom the product is being sent supplies a legible photocopy of a valid government-issued identification and is over the age of 18. Violation is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 plus costs of investigation and litigation including attorney’s fees.
                      MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 93A § 2 & 4 & CODE of MASS. REGS. tit. 940, § 21.04 (2000).
                      A separate, identical regulation to the one above applies to cigars and little cigars. Violation is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 plus costs of investigation and litigation including attorney’s fees.
                      MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 93A §§ 2 & 4 & CODE of MASS. REGS. tit. 940, § 22.06 (2000).

                      http://www.tobacco-facts.net/usa-tob.../massachusetts

                      Depends on how they define "mail". Is that USPS, or all carriers? I'd assume the more restrictive interpretation because life sucks that way :^/

                      Comment

                      • sgreger1
                        Member
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 9451

                        #71
                        Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
                        http://www.tobacco-facts.net/usa-tob.../massachusetts

                        Depends on how they define "mail". Is that USPS, or all carriers? I'd assume the more restrictive interpretation because of INCREASINGLY INTRUSIVE POLICE STATE:^/

                        FTFY bro.

                        Comment

                        • lxskllr
                          Member
                          • Sep 2007
                          • 13435

                          #72
                          Originally posted by sgreger1 View Post
                          FTFY bro.
                          Fair enough. I was using general terms, but you specified how life sucks in this case :^D

                          Comment

                          • FINALBOSS
                            Member
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 37

                            #73
                            Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
                            http://www.tobacco-facts.net/usa-tob.../massachusetts

                            Depends on how they define "mail". Is that USPS, or all carriers? I'd assume the more restrictive interpretation because life sucks that way :^/


                            "Exempts mail-order sales"


                            Northerner = mail-order sales.

                            Comment

                            • EricHill78
                              Member
                              • Jun 2010
                              • 4253

                              #74
                              Is this going to be a trend other states will follow??? I'm a bit worried. This allways happens when I find something I like. I'll repeat what I've posted before.. Why the he'll are they punishing us for finding a safer alternative to cigarettes??? The studies have been done.. This is just Rediculous

                              Comment

                              • lxskllr
                                Member
                                • Sep 2007
                                • 13435

                                #75
                                Originally posted by FINALBOSS View Post
                                "Exempts mail-order sales"


                                Northerner = mail-order sales.
                                Ah, I overlooked that. I hate reading legal documents :^/

                                Comment

                                Related Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X