Originally posted by lxskllr
View Post
Of course, in Krahv's situation he is in the EU where snus is more prominent and I believe outright illegal for sale in some parts of Europe.
As far as entrapment goes, entrapment is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but most of the time it's not really entrapment. The cited court defintion of entrapment is as follows:
A person is 'entrapped' when he is induced or persuaded by law enforcement officers or their agents to commit a crime that he had no previous intent to commit.
However, there is no entrapment where a person is ready and willing to break the law and the Government agents merely provide what appears to be a favorable opportunity for the person to commit the crime. For example, it is not entrapment for a Government agent to pretend to be someone else and to offer, either directly or through an informer or other decoy, to engage in an unlawful transaction with the person. So, a person would not be a victim of entrapment if the person was ready, willing and able to commit the crime charged in the indictment whenever opportunity was afforded, and that Government officers or their agents did no more than offer an opportunity.
Comment