LoL!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dxh
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 340

    #31
    Originally posted by danielan View Post
    Thanks?



    I don't necessarily disagree. Unfortunately, as Obama seems to be intent on proving beyond a shadow of a doubt, raw intelligence is not the most important quality for a president. Although it might be helpful if our national challenges end up being Trivial Pursuit or Scrabble.



    I suspect your version of "truthful" is whatever you pre-determined to be the "truth". i.e., "giggle, giggle, I only read the National Enquirer and People Magazine, giggle, giggle..."

    Again, I expect that like other executives she received a daily news brief of some sort from staffers.



    The great thing about Federalism is that laws can differ according to the real differences between states. While from Santa Cruz it may seem appalling to kill a "majestic" wolf. In Alaska, where there are plenty of wolves, you might imagine the laws would differ. As far as doing it from airplanes... I have to assume you have never been to Alaska... Break out your Google Maps and check out the insanely large areas without roads at all. Add to this that you basically get 2 seasons in Alaska - Winter and "Bugs". If you want to manage your population of wolves you basically have to use airplanes.



    It's not just her. In fact, Illinois seems to have had the same problem. I wonder if a certain State Senator would have taken a stand in Illinois they would be better off too.

    Victims rights is a large issue (and I have no solutions), and unfortunately this doesn't only happen in Alaska. It still happens in a lot of places - even though, as of a couple years ago, it shouldn't. There are laws against this practice. Some Federal, some State. Some people still fall through the cracks. Localities don't like the unfunded mandates (Federal and State). States don't like the Federal unfunded mandate. Hospitals just want paid (anecdotally some of this billing seems to happen due to slow state payment). Insurance ends up paying for a lot of them (which I kind of also have a problem with). Many more get reimbursed by victims compensation funds, but it is still a reimbursement (so you have to pay first). I'm not sure this is more screwed up then having to pay for your own ambulance ride and surgery when you are shot or your family having to pay for your burial if you are murdered (happily victims compensation funds help here too - and insurance.) Not that it makes it any better, but you can certainly sue for these sorts of things when they catch the perpetrator.

    http://www.propublica.org/article/de...exam-bills-730
    I think you are retarded based off of your support for her.
    That's my opinion...man

    It is easy to dismiss others with insults right?
    I obviously get my news from tabloid sources because I disagree with you?

    I spent plenty of time in Alaska. There is no threat from wolves. They are entitled to life just like us.
    I am a southern boy. Raised hunting and fishing in Virginia. I moved to Santa Cruz for a job...dick

    Comment

    • danielan
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 1514

      #32
      Originally posted by bipolarbear1968 View Post
      Edit- Enjoy paying those excess taxes.
      PACT did not add any additional taxes.

      Comment

      • myuserid
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 1645

        #33
        Originally posted by danielan View Post
        Yeah, because this inexperienced guy is doing SO well. Before him, I never realized that "Leadership" was mostly a matter of blaming the last guy and playing basketball.

        I'm gonna have to run for president now.
        That really is a great line.

        Don't forget golf. It helps take your mind off oil spills.

        Comment

        • dxh
          Member
          • Jun 2010
          • 340

          #34
          Originally posted by myuserid View Post
          That really is a great line.

          Don't forget golf. It helps take your mind off oil spills.
          And terrorists

          Comment

          • lxskllr
            Member
            • Sep 2007
            • 13435

            #35
            Originally posted by danielan View Post
            Or, maybe, she gets a news brief every morning with 50 different sources on it and doesn't want to publicly express a preference for any particular commercial news organization.
            Again, name your sources. All she has to say is "I don't know. I have reports prepared to me by my staff". While that's kind of lame in itself since it would demonstrate she has no idea of the source quality, it would at least be honest.

            For what? VP's don't enforce laws. VP's don't write laws. VP's don't determine the Constitutionality of laws. The Executive has a massive number of lawyers to review whatever needs reviewed. I completely object to the opinion that the President or VP needs to be a lawyer or legal scholar.
            She could very well end up as president, and she should have a basic grounding in constitutional law. I don't know about you, but I expect more from my leaders than I do the counter girl at WaWa. I guess I'm just an asshole that way ;^)

            While we are at it. The question was, "What other Supreme Court cases do you object to?" Not, "Can you describe the role of the Supreme Court?". You do not need opinions on Supreme court cases to uphold the law. In fact, if you let your opinions drive your enforcement, or lack thereof, you are kind of a bad executive.
            The real question we should be focusing on is her inherent contradiction of supporting privacy, but being against Roe V Wade.

            Comment

            • myuserid
              Member
              • Jun 2010
              • 1645

              #36
              Originally posted by dxh View Post
              And terrorists
              Obama doesn't like having to think about them either.

              Cuts into too much of his vacation and golf time.

              I thought the world was gonna love us when Obama was elected, and the only reason they didn't already was because of Bush.

              Comment

              • dxh
                Member
                • Jun 2010
                • 340

                #37
                Originally posted by myuserid View Post
                Obama doesn't like bothering with them either.

                I thought the world was gonna love us when Obama was elected, and the only reason they didn't already was because of Bush.

                Whatever happened to that?
                Well I have no idea what you mean. Obama never said that, is that what you thought would happen?
                I had no expectations. I have issues with our government from it's conception to current state. Was never a government for the people, just the wealthy. I do not hate Obama or Bush. Which gets a lot of people confused because they think in such black and white...shame cause the grey is where all the fun is.

                Comment

                • danielan
                  Member
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 1514

                  #38
                  Originally posted by dxh View Post
                  I think you are retarded based off of your support for her. That's my opinion...man
                  You can't possibly imagine how much I don't care about the opinion of a drug user from California. That's my opinion.

                  For the record, I don't support her. I didn't vote for her. I "threw my vote away" on a third party candidate.

                  Originally posted by dxh View Post
                  It is easy to dismiss others with insults right? I obviously get my news from tabloid sources because I disagree with you?
                  Put down the bong and re-read it. I suspect that your version of the "truth" from her would be that she gets her news from tabloids.

                  Originally posted by dxh View Post
                  They are entitled to life just like us...Raised hunting and fishing in Virginia.
                  Hypocrite.

                  Comment

                  • dxh
                    Member
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 340

                    #39
                    Originally posted by danielan View Post
                    You can't possibly imagine how much I don't care about the opinion of a drug user from California. That's my opinion.

                    For the record, I don't support her. I didn't vote for her. I "threw my vote away" on a third party candidate.



                    Put down the bong and re-read it. I suspect that your version of the "truth" from her would be that she gets her news from tabloids.



                    Hypocrite.
                    There is a difference in hunting for food, then poaching.
                    For the record. I could also give two ass hairs about you.
                    Again. Sticks and stones.
                    I am enjoying my bong. Haha. You are a drug addict to. Mr nicotine...Talk about hypocrite.
                    I find your BS funny

                    Comment

                    • danielan
                      Member
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 1514

                      #40
                      Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
                      The real question we should be focusing on is her inherent contradiction of supporting privacy, but being against Roe V Wade.
                      You're not really responding to the other 2 issues with anything substantive. So, let's talk about this one.

                      I completely support privacy. I think it is firmly grounded in the US Constitution and is a natural right. I also am completely against murder. I don't see a conflict with those 2 positions.

                      Abortion? I don't really care. I'm pretty much ok with Liberals killing their kids.

                      Comment

                      • Premium Parrots
                        Super Moderators
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 9764

                        #41
                        now this thread really is getting LOL.
                        Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of the people I killed because they were annoying......





                        I've been wrong lots of times.  Lots of times I've thought I was wrong only to find out that I was right in the beginning.


                        Comment

                        • Mr. Snuffleupagus
                          Member
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 2781

                          #42
                          I think Dan's just got the hots for her...

                          Comment

                          • dxh
                            Member
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 340

                            #43
                            Originally posted by danielan View Post
                            You're not really responding to the other 2 issues with anything substantive. So, let's talk about this one.

                            I completely support privacy. I think it is firmly grounded in the US Constitution and is a natural right. I also am completely against murder. I don't see a conflict with those 2 positions.

                            Abortion? I don't really care. I'm pretty much ok with Liberals killing their kids.
                            You don't see a conflict because you are an armchair neo con who has an elitist sheltered view of things. Like only liberals get abortions?
                            You are a troll...plain and simple. This is a snus forum and I feel like I am the ****ing 5th grade here.
                            Attacking me, my state, and my opinion just because it is different.
                            That sounds a lot like...a Fascist

                            Comment

                            • snusgetter
                              Member
                              • May 2010
                              • 10903

                              #44
                              Ya gotta love snuson!!!

                              Here's a thread titled LOL! -
                              that really gets into political
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	Smiley_StirringS&#10.gif
Views:	1
Size:	4.4 KB
ID:	595436

                              I don't think I've enjoyed bystanding
                              a thread as much as this one!!

                              Comment

                              • dxh
                                Member
                                • Jun 2010
                                • 340

                                #45
                                Originally posted by snusgetter View Post
                                Here's a thread titled LOL! -
                                that really gets into political
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]452[/ATTACH]

                                I don't think I've enjoyed bystanding
                                a thread as much as this one!!
                                Glad it is providing some entertainment

                                Comment

                                Related Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X