Rand Paul supporters take down protester, stomp her head...

[tom502]

OK, sgreg is right. She did attempt to assult Dr. Paul, and even got to his car before being stopped. The media though is only going on about the foot. Bias? They are controlled by Soros, so they want to give Conway the edge.

http://www.infowars.com/new-video-sh...ult-rand-paul/

[devilock76]

OK, sgreg is right. She did attempt to assult Dr. Paul, and even got to his car before being stopped. The media though is only going on about the foot. Bias? They are controlled by Soros, so they want to give Conway the edge.

http://www.infowars.com/new-video-sh...ult-rand-paul/

If that was Obama approaching, even though he would be in his bullet proof limo, someone rushing the car like that could very likely be shot by secret service for doing so. Does not excuse the stomp, but people need to stop trying to play innocent when they bait a situation.

Ken

[sgreger1]

Yah Joe I saw that already. My point is not that he was justified, as he is an idiot, my point is that if you keep rushing towards a politician to get in his face you may be liable to get tackled. The same would happen I you did this to Obama or Clinton. She tried blowing it up like they had realized who she was and started surrounding her in some kind of hillbilly circle, an that she tried to run away and they gave her a concussion. As you can see from the new video that is patently false.

I'm sorry but this is just like the protestors who got shot for attacking and stabbing Israeli soldiers, she knew the risk when she thwarted a politicians security detail and rushed him twice. I don't want to hear this cry baby shit anymore. Why are these leftwibg blowhard pundits not making a big deal when someone from the left does this? Then they keep saying this is like 1930's Germany browncoat shit, which is a complete over exaduration of what happened.


He shouldn't have put his foot on her to restrain her but really this is such a non issue that te left is trying to blow out of proportion.

[sgreger1]

Well it cerainly looks like. Duck, but does it quack like a duck?

[Roo]

Seems like everyone is blowing it out of proportion. Everyone is turning the incident into a reflection of the candidates and/or their supporters. It happened. Who cares? Yeah, you don't go shoving signs into politicians car windows at their face during their own rally. And yeah, you don't slam a girl to the ground and step on her for doing so. Even though this guy was on Paul's payroll, it is my understanding that he wasn't in any sort of security or crowd-control position. Where was security? That's why your comparison, sgreger, of it being the same as bumrushing Obama or Clinton and getting shot by the secret service is erroneous. So he was way out of place and so was she. It really has nothing to do with liberal-this or tea-party that, or weather or not the chick was a "carpet-licker", as Tom eloquently put it, or whether homeboy with the white running shoes was a frenzied redneck. Man the politics in this country are so ****ed, as is the media spin on every ****ing thing. It makes me sick.

[devilock76]

Yah Joe I saw that already. My point is not that he was justified, as he is an idiot, my point is that if you keep rushing towards a politician to get in his face you may be liable to get tackled. The same would happen I you did this to Obama or Clinton. She tried blowing it up like they had realized who she was and started surrounding her in some kind of hillbilly circle, an that she tried to run away and they gave her a concussion. As you can see from the new video that is patently false.

I'm sorry but this is just like the protestors who got shot for attacking and stabbing Israeli soldiers, she knew the risk when she thwarted a politicians security detail and rushed him twice. I don't want to hear this cry baby shit anymore. Why are these leftwibg blowhard pundits not making a big deal when someone from the left does this? Then they keep saying this is like 1930's Germany browncoat shit, which is a complete over exaduration of what happened.


He shouldn't have put his foot on her to restrain her but really this is such a non issue that te left is trying to blow out of proportion.

Additionally, she went with a wig on, and obviously that wig was an intended disguise. Why the disguise? Innocent intentions start going out the window when critical thinking is used.

Ken

[devilock76]

Well it cerainly looks like. Duck, but does it quack like a duck?

It could be a rabbit.

Ken

[devilock76]

Seems like everyone is blowing it out of proportion. Everyone is turning the incident into a reflection of the candidates and/or their supporters. It happened. Who cares? Yeah, you don't go shoving signs into politicians car windows at their face during their own rally. And yeah, you don't slam a girl to the ground and step on her for doing so. Even though this guy was on Paul's payroll, it is my understanding that he wasn't in any sort of security or crowd-control position. Where was security? That's why your comparison, sgreger, of it being the same as bumrushing Obama or Clinton and getting shot by the secret service is erroneous. So he was way out of place and so was she. It really has nothing to do with liberal-this or tea-party that, or weather or not the chick was a "carpet-licker", as Tom eloquently put it, or whether homeboy with the white running shoes was a frenzied redneck. Man the politics in this country are so ****ed, as is the media spin on every ****ing thing. It makes me sick.

Actually I made the secret service comparison, and it was only to make a point of how she approached the car. My point is still valid, and like I said when I mentioned it, it doesn't excuse the stomp, but it certainly puts the nature of how she ended up in that position in a more accurate light.

Ken

[Roo]

Sorry to have misquoted you sgreger. Whatever, my point is that the whole discussion is being used to paint opposing sides in a bad light and it's ****ing stupid. "Oh the tea party people stomped an innocent protester, they are crazy wacko rednecks and this invalidates their entire agenda". "oh yeah? well this crazy moveon bitch had such left-wing extremist fervor that she bumrushed Paul's car and got what she deserved, goddamn hippy dyke liberals". So I'm exaggerating but hopefully you get the point.

[sgreger1]

Seems like everyone is blowing it out of proportion. Everyone is turning the incident into a reflection of the candidates and/or their supporters. It happened. Who cares? Yeah, you don't go shoving signs into politicians car windows at their face during their own rally. And yeah, you don't slam a girl to the ground and step on her for doing so. Even though this guy was on Paul's payroll, it is my understanding that he wasn't in any sort of security or crowd-control position. Where was security? That's why your comparison, sgreger, of it being the same as bumrushing Obama or Clinton and getting shot by the secret service is erroneous. So he was way out of place and so was she. It really has nothing to do with liberal-this or tea-party that, or weather or not the chick was a "carpet-licker", as Tom eloquently put it, or whether homeboy with the white running shoes was a frenzied redneck. Man the politics in this country are so ****ed, as is the media spin on every ****ing thing. It makes me sick.

No my claim was not erroneous. If you watch the first video where it shows him on her head, you will see 1 or 2 other people who are tackling her, and one who is telling the guy to not put his foot on her head, that is the security staff. She was tackled by the security staff and then this guy steps in (no pun intended) and steps on her head, at which the point the security detail tells him to knock it the **** off, and he does.


It was something to be handled by security, it was handled by security, this random redneck walks in and puts his foot on her to restrain her, which he should not have done. If he was trying to hurt her he would have kicked her or curb stomped her ass, instead he was applying pressure with his foot untill the security guard told him to knock it off.

[sgreger1]

Sorry to have misquoted you sgreger. Whatever, my point is that the whole discussion is being used to paint opposing sides in a bad light and it's ****ing stupid. "Oh the tea party people stomped an innocent protester, they are crazy wacko rednecks and this invalidates their entire agenda". "oh yeah? well this crazy moveon bitch had such left-wing extremist fervor that she bumrushed Paul's car and got what she deserved, goddamn hippy dyke liberals". So I'm exaggerating but hopefully you get the point.

I fail to see the exaduration, those are direct quotes from this thread, no?

[devilock76]

Sorry to have misquoted you sgreger. Whatever, my point is that the whole discussion is being used to paint opposing sides in a bad light and it's ****ing stupid. "Oh the tea party people stomped an innocent protester, they are crazy wacko rednecks and this invalidates their entire agenda". "oh yeah? well this crazy moveon bitch had such left-wing extremist fervor that she bumrushed Paul's car and got what she deserved, goddamn hippy dyke liberals". So I'm exaggerating but hopefully you get the point.

Problem is the reference you were trying to counter point said nothing of that nature.

Ken

[sgreger1]

Devilock's point is very valid, if someone had rushed Obama and stuck some shit in his face, and then got tackled and restrained by security and possibly other people standing nearby, would it be because Obama wants 1930's nazi germany, or is it because you just don't rush politicians like that.

But Roo's point is taken, that this is all a non-issue, which is in fact what it is.


People, the nation is becoming divided in a way we probably havn't seen sine the civil war. There has always been a divide between the left and the right, but today it is getting bigger, and now we have other layers ontop of it, race division, class division, haves/havenot division etc. Shit is about to get ugly, expect a lot more violence in the future. And I mean real violence, not some hippy chick trying to get tackled for publicity purposes and then getting tackled.

[truthwolf1]

The hardcore Obama supporters are admittedly being rushed to see the light only after two years but they will eventually see it. It took most Bush supporters a second term before realizing their mistake.

We already know what Bush has gotten us into and now the people need to wake up that Obama is just as much of a Bush.

Once more lefties and conservatives can be pushed towards the middle, the hope is some real change.

[devilock76]

The hardcore Obama supporters are admittedly being rushed to see the light only after two years but they will eventually see it. It took most Bush supporters a second term before realizing their mistake.

We already know what Bush has gotten us into and now the people need to wake up that Obama is just as much of a Bush.

Once more lefties and conservatives can be pushed towards the middle, the hope is some real change.

I never considered Bush a conservative. He definitely wasn't a conservative as far as fiscal issues go. Honestly the only thing about Bush that was conservative were his religious views. We are speaking of GWB here, not GHWB, just to mention. To me Bush was basically a religious fundamentalist in office.

Ken