WSJ Snus Article...very encouraging

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cpnhagen23
    New Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 8

    #1

    WSJ Snus Article...very encouraging

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301644462817757.html

    Highlights:

    One recent study showed that some newer brands, with names like Ariva, Camel Snus and Marlboro Snus, have sharply lower levels of a dangerous carcinogen than do older varieties of smokeless tobacco, such as Copenhagen and Skoal. Britain's Royal College of Physicians, which sets health standards in the United Kingdom, has said smokeless tobacco is between one-tenth and one-one thousandth as hazardous as smoking, depending on the specific product.

    Studies of Swedish snus users have found no elevated incidence of mouth cancer compared with the general population. Other studies, however, have linked snus consumption to cardiovascular disease, albeit at rates far below the risks of smoking, and some research has found a minor link with pancreatic cancer. Many of the studies were performed by the Swedish government, which discourages the use of snus and cigarettes.
    A federally funded study by the University of Minnesota's Masonic Cancer Center found that Camel Snus, made by Reynolds American unit R.J. Reynolds, and Marlboro Snus, made by Altria's Philip Morris unit, bear substantially lower levels of nitrosamines, the class of carcinogen that most concerns public-health officials, than do traditional brands. The study, published in the December issue of Nicotine & Tobacco Research, a leading journal of researchers battling tobacco-caused disease, was similar to one done in 2006 measuring the carcinogen in Ariva and Stonewall, two smokeless-tobacco products made by tiny Star Scientific Inc.
    "The reduction in carcinogenic...content in the new smokeless tobacco is encouraging," concluded the authors, none of whom had financial ties to industry.
    There is also a cool little chart that compares Snus to Snuff. Bascially smokeless tobacco is a shit ton more healthy than smoking and Snus is about 2x better for you than dipping. Sounds like a winner!
  • snusjus
    Member
    • Jun 2008
    • 2674

    #2
    The chart used outdated data for General snus. The data was taken from April 2006; almost all Swedish Match snus is near or below 1.0 parts per million for nitrosamine levels as of 2008. Nonetheless, a very interesting article. I'm glad to hear that Camel and Marlboro snus have fairly low levels of nitrosamines. I was also interested to hear that Philip Morris has increased the levels of nicotine in their snus. Maybe they have cowboy-spys reading this forum about our complaints! As well, the fact that Camel snus has sufficient levels of nicotine now to curb cigarette cravings is interesting. I assume the nationally launched Camel snus contains higher levels.

    Comment

    • TropicalBob
      Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 316

      #3
      Yes, that's a very fair article on the smokeless alternative. I'm a huge fan and user of Stonewall Java dissolvables, and have been since the introduction of Ariva and Stonewall. Snus actually followed my Stonewall use, and both are now daily habits.

      I like a variety of snus, but won't stick my nose in the air and pretend I'm above Camel. It tastes great. I can't wait for it to become widely available where I live, because I surely liked the tins I tried during its selected introduction. Marlboro -- another story. Like chewing gum. But without nicotine. I'll try it again, just to see if I can feel the nicotine they say they're adding.

      Comment

      Related Topics

      Collapse

      Working...
      X