i'm too lazy to read through all the banter here, but i'll leave a couple tidbits.
first of all, i find it funny the deniers of anthropogenic climate change want to argue with experts of the field, over the motive that the government is going to rape and ruin everyone if it is accepted as true. Isn't this the motive? Correct me if i'm wrong.
Instead of crying about how you think it's all propaganda, perhaps once hypothetically thinking that if it is true and we're all ****ed if it is (regardless of what the government could possibly do harmful to amount to a planet in a destabilized climate that puts the entire human race in jeopardy..aside of course from nuclear war), that then we can worry about the methods that go into place that are proposed to eliminate it. Since that is the motive for caring about it in the first place, right?
Seems like the focus is lost here....If one is so hell bent on preventing bad methods of reducing anthropogenic climate change (like those that do not actually curb it, but instead tax the shit out of everyone), then fight THAT...not the data of the climate change itself. Because if it's true, it matters not your fears of the evil government taking your precious freedom. You're going to be worrying about a place that is habitable...let alone who runs it. But I don't think you guys are a threat to worsening climate change particularly, you're just noisy and wasting your time.
basically saying, scientists don't give a shit about your personal opinions, so they're going with the anthropogenic climate change persuasion anyway. I don't think scientists know everything, but they do know much more than the general public and are constantly under scrutiny of their equally educated peers. Try reading the scientific journals instead of the magazines and listening to the radio hosts. Focus ones efforts on fighting bullshit prevention methods that waste money and unnecessarily infringe freedoms. Because nobody wants that shit, whether they believe the probelm is there or not. Or is it just easier to deny the whole problem exists so you can't be bothered with figuring out which prevention methods are bs and which aren't? I wouldn't be surprised if it is, seeing as you guys can't be bothered to verify the information beyond sensationalistic opinion suppliers.
Here's some good videos that blow apart this climate gate bullshit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXesBhYwdRo
here's the beginning of the series that tries to explain how the issue works:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo
first of all, i find it funny the deniers of anthropogenic climate change want to argue with experts of the field, over the motive that the government is going to rape and ruin everyone if it is accepted as true. Isn't this the motive? Correct me if i'm wrong.
Instead of crying about how you think it's all propaganda, perhaps once hypothetically thinking that if it is true and we're all ****ed if it is (regardless of what the government could possibly do harmful to amount to a planet in a destabilized climate that puts the entire human race in jeopardy..aside of course from nuclear war), that then we can worry about the methods that go into place that are proposed to eliminate it. Since that is the motive for caring about it in the first place, right?
Seems like the focus is lost here....If one is so hell bent on preventing bad methods of reducing anthropogenic climate change (like those that do not actually curb it, but instead tax the shit out of everyone), then fight THAT...not the data of the climate change itself. Because if it's true, it matters not your fears of the evil government taking your precious freedom. You're going to be worrying about a place that is habitable...let alone who runs it. But I don't think you guys are a threat to worsening climate change particularly, you're just noisy and wasting your time.
basically saying, scientists don't give a shit about your personal opinions, so they're going with the anthropogenic climate change persuasion anyway. I don't think scientists know everything, but they do know much more than the general public and are constantly under scrutiny of their equally educated peers. Try reading the scientific journals instead of the magazines and listening to the radio hosts. Focus ones efforts on fighting bullshit prevention methods that waste money and unnecessarily infringe freedoms. Because nobody wants that shit, whether they believe the probelm is there or not. Or is it just easier to deny the whole problem exists so you can't be bothered with figuring out which prevention methods are bs and which aren't? I wouldn't be surprised if it is, seeing as you guys can't be bothered to verify the information beyond sensationalistic opinion suppliers.
Here's some good videos that blow apart this climate gate bullshit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXesBhYwdRo
here's the beginning of the series that tries to explain how the issue works:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo
Comment