-
-
[quote="Judge Faust"]
Lol you think The people's republic of china is the worlds leading superpower?I don't see what the People's Republic of China has to do with this discussion.
Not quite, china is strong but would be worthless without the US and our immense spending. They would be insolvent overnight if the US dissapeared.
We've won with the odds against us before. As far as taking on all of europe no probably would not have won. but to claim the US had no part in defeating the Nazi's in WWII is not fair. We were a significant factor in the destruction of the fascists.I think that's a safe assumption. At no point in time was the US big or powerful enough to take on all of Europe at the same time. And a fascist empire would have unified all of Europe. You would have been conclusively rolled over in a week or less.
Your right, Russia came out of WWII as the leader of the free world, and is the shinning light on the hill that all the rest of the world comes to when it needs something. :roll:Defeated? Heh. Suffering from delusions of grandeur much lately? I would love to find out how exactly it is that you take credit for the purely domestic meltdown of a foreign nation.
(Oh, and that arms race may have had something to do with it)Comment
-
I think if it was one on one, Germany would have beat the US.Comment
-
Judge,
What country do you reside if you don't mind me asking?
PMDComment
-
Originally posted by tom502
Yah Germany was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay advanced back then> those panzers were melting our armored divisions like butter. What was it like 6 US tanks to 1 panzer? We really gained the edge once Hitler over extended himself on too many fronts and we were able to swoop up all of thier top scientists.
Like Von Braun, the US would nobe the same without the Nazi scientists. This came up in a thread before and everyone called me an anti-semite and started multiple other threads about it. But history speaks for itself, we gained our edge by edge by enlisting the Nazi scientists and they are the ones who brought us to the forefront of technology because they were so much better than ours. AND on top of that they had significant intel on the Russians at the time wich was of extreme value to us. I think the US made the right call.Comment
-
I think he is from Russia. But he does have the best avatar here, even though I think commies are bad, they had the coolest symbols and evil looking figures. Stalin looks like a supervillian straight out of a comic book lolOriginally posted by ProudMarineDadComment
-
The nazis had the coolest art, imagery, and uniforms.Comment
-
Originally posted by tom502
Yah i'm kind of pissed off that the swaztika has this negative connotation now. i would don the Nazi Class-A military uniforms any day. Those things were beautifull. And their symbolism was way cooler than ours. US needs to hire some new artists when developing of symbols and icons in the future.Comment
-
In another thread he said he's from the bread basket of the Soviet Union, which I think is the Ukraine but he goes on to call Ukraine traitorous. He also alludes to living somewhere on the Muni route so I think thats anywhere in the Bay area. Unfortunately in that thread he also said he plans to move to China but has obviously not made it yet.
Anyway, I have learned from experience not to argue with Marxists (let alone soviet communists) since the bases of those philosophies lies in conflict theory which is a polar opposite to the free market leaning views of Ludvig Von Mises who actually places class conflict on the shoulders of government as opposed to fixing this conflict with more government.
I'd rather just laugh at them. This guy has already weathered flame wars.Comment
-
Originally posted by RRK
THIS
Why the world has not yet realized that large invasive overbearing nanny state gov is bad, and regular joes trading freely amongst each other is good, is beyond me.Comment
-
Nuff said in my opinion. Don't get no better than this.Originally posted by sgreger1
Most if not all of you folks are a lot smarter than I am so before you start making any smart remarks about this old dumb redneck being narrow minded, I thought I would add this warning sign.
Comment
-
We all know it's the man that makes the uniform.
I think symbolism would help unite the US general population.
Another point, the "swastika" was on US Army uniforms, however the symbol was changed because of it's popularity with the NAZIs.
Making assumptions about history is the same as making assumptions about the future but without the fear of being proven wrong "coulda, woulda, shoulda" never changed anything.Comment
-
When was the swastika used on US uniforms? Do you have any pics? Link?Comment
-
Originally posted by ProudMarineDadNuff said in my opinion. Don't get no better than this.
Most if not all of you folks are a lot smarter than I am so before you start making any smart remarks about this old dumb redneck being narrow minded, I thought I would add this warning sign.
While we do have kind of generic symbols, (like the star for the army), the colors we display mean something, and although we've have our falters in the past, the US for the most part has always been a symbol of hope and freedom, and we are the ones who prop up a lot of countries that would starve otehrwise. We are the most cheritable and always come to the defense of our allies, even when they will not come to our defense in the future. Because we know it's right.Comment
-
-
Rush ranks Palin, Pawlenty (for 2012 from Rush biography)
politico ^ | Monday May 24, 2010 |
Posted on Monday, May 24, 2010 10:12:43... -
KARODA, INDIA -- No one in this village visits Chanderpati Banwala's home, which stands at the end of a lane full of sleeping buffaloes and overturned...25-05-10, 05:45 AM
-
-
OK LISTEN UP
I"M ONLY GOING TO POST THIS ONCE!
After the great success and great fun of ddandb's box pass I have been... -
OK guys here is what we have got. Rather than just creating a hall of fame (which will be looked at once by most and then forgotten). The mods think it...
Comment