Jon Stewart lays the smack down on Obama and exposes all the promises he hasn't kept

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tom502
    Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 8985

    #61
    I hope soon Amedinijad publicly exposes the US moon landing hoax. I like how he is a world leader, not afraid to say the things that need to be said, yet the others are afraid to say. The 911 false flag event is crumbling, and so is the other verboten thing.

    Comment

    • texastorm
      Member
      • Jul 2010
      • 386

      #62
      Originally posted by tom502 View Post
      I hope soon Amedinijad publicly exposes the US moon landing hoax. I like how he is a world leader, not afraid to say the things that need to be said, yet the others are afraid to say. The 911 false flag event is crumbling, and so is the other verboten thing.
      That is the most ridiculous post in this thread.

      I really really want to believe you are just posting really dumb things to get a reaction. Because if you believe half of what you write you should seek serious help. Your tin foil expenses would go down quite a bit.


      EDIT to add: I am not saying that our government doesn't cover up some stuff, but aliens, moon landings and flouride do not strike me as top contenders. I believe that some things were covered up during 911, but not the entire plot. We have been watching to much tv, these theories are like a bad Austin Powers movie.

      Comment

      • tom502
        Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 8985

        #63
        Well, you gotta agree, he makes the world a bit more interesting.

        Comment

        • truthwolf1
          Member
          • Oct 2008
          • 2696

          #64
          I really like where he is going with this but the US will never allow the UN to do it and I would also agree we should not have foreigners do it. It will have to be done by ourselves. It is really important to stop the ADL before they initiate into American law "thought crime prison terms", for investigating the Holocaust/911.

          Ahmadinejad, who has in the past cast doubt over the U.S. version of the Sept. 11 attacks, called for establishment of an independent fact-finding U.N. body to probe the attacks and stop it from turning into another sacred issue where "expressing opinion about it won't be banned".

          Comment

          • tom502
            Member
            • Feb 2009
            • 8985

            #65
            It would have to be a truely independent group to do it. Any official gevernment group would simply give us what they already have. And I bet they would say it's a matter of national security that whatever "evidence" may still exist, cannot be examined.

            Comment

            • truthwolf1
              Member
              • Oct 2008
              • 2696

              #66
              Originally posted by tom502 View Post
              It would have to be a truely independent group to do it. Any official gevernment group would simply give us what they already have. And I bet they would say it's a matter of national security that whatever "evidence" may still exist, cannot be examined.
              Yup.

              Comment

              • sgreger1
                Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 9451

                #67
                You guys are dreaming. First of all they already got rid of the evidence. Anything else they have including tapes would never find themselves in the hands of investigators or in a court room because of national security. There would be nothing to investigate. That's the thing, if something did happen, it's gone. There is no way this will ever happen, no matter how big the 9-11 truth lobby gets, because it can't be done.

                Comment

                • devilock76
                  Member
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 1737

                  #68
                  Originally posted by tom502 View Post
                  It would have to be a truely independent group to do it. Any official gevernment group would simply give us what they already have. And I bet they would say it's a matter of national security that whatever "evidence" may still exist, cannot be examined.
                  Could there ever truly be such an independent group for these things to the level their effects have permeated the global political/social/economic strata?

                  Ken

                  Comment

                  • sgreger1
                    Member
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 9451

                    #69
                    Originally posted by tom502 View Post
                    It would have to be a truely independent group to do it. Any official gevernment group would simply give us what they already have. And I bet they would say it's a matter of national security that whatever "evidence" may still exist, cannot be examined.

                    Yah all we need is a truly independent group and a unicorn. The unicorn i think we can manage, but the truly independent group is a myth which I don't think has any basis in reality.

                    Lets say you chose 10 Americans at random to do an investigation. If there were such an elaborate conspiracy being covered up, than someone would get to those 10 people.

                    Comment

                    • MGX
                      Member
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 127

                      #70
                      One could, say, hire some top notch PhD structural engineers to investigate...wait, that's been done.

                      When the scientists and engineers start screaming 'cover up', then I'll be concerned (Surely they're all spending their government hush money in paradise resorts ). However don't misunderstand - I fully support the fringe as their theories are entertaining.

                      Comment

                      • truthwolf1
                        Member
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 2696

                        #71
                        Originally posted by MGX
                        One could, say, hire some top notch PhD structural engineers to investigate...wait, that's been done.

                        When the scientists and engineers start screaming 'cover up', then I'll be concerned (Surely they're all spending their government hush money in paradise resorts ). However don't misunderstand - I fully support the fringe as their theories are entertaining.
                        I am glad they are entertaining to you. GO FRINGE YOURSELF!

                        James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST's investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.

                        http://www2.ae911truth.org/info/12

                        Comment

                        • bipolarbear1968
                          Member
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 1074

                          #72

                          Comment

                          • MGX
                            Member
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 127

                            #73
                            Originally posted by truthwolf1 View Post
                            I am glad they are entertaining to you. GO FRINGE YOURSELF!

                            James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST's investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.

                            http://www2.ae911truth.org/info/12
                            His main point is addressed immediately afterward his statements in the document. The first point is intelligible. Perhaps it was a mistake but #1 makes little sense. He does have good credentials, U of Maryland is a well regarded fire protection engineering school (one of very few in the world). However a few questions doesn't negate column buckling; the FEA [finite element analysis] is the best we have but with any iterative solution; garbage in, garbage out. I've seen the FEA and it makes sense. The fellow's concerns don't amount to a government cover up and towards the end of his testimony he's pandering for more money.

                            Comment

                            • raptor
                              Member
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 753

                              #74
                              Originally posted by bipolarbear1968 View Post
                              Yes, Reagan was a shining beacon of asdfhgahasghag

                              Comment

                              • sgreger1
                                Member
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 9451

                                #75
                                Originally posted by raptor View Post
                                Yes, Reagan was a shining beacon of asdfhgahasghag

                                Just out of curiosity, what was your beef with reagan?

                                For me it was the big government, overspending, hyper comministophobic atmosphere. but I think he was the Obama of the right. When republicans hear him they like him and want to trust him, even if his record isn't perfect.

                                /The gipper

                                Comment

                                Related Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X