Jon Stewart lays the smack down on Obama and exposes all the promises he hasn't kept

[tom502]

I hope soon Amedinijad publicly exposes the US moon landing hoax. I like how he is a world leader, not afraid to say the things that need to be said, yet the others are afraid to say. The 911 false flag event is crumbling, and so is the other verboten thing.

[texastorm]

I hope soon Amedinijad publicly exposes the US moon landing hoax. I like how he is a world leader, not afraid to say the things that need to be said, yet the others are afraid to say. The 911 false flag event is crumbling, and so is the other verboten thing.

That is the most ridiculous post in this thread.

I really really want to believe you are just posting really dumb things to get a reaction. Because if you believe half of what you write you should seek serious help. Your tin foil expenses would go down quite a bit.


EDIT to add: I am not saying that our government doesn't cover up some stuff, but aliens, moon landings and flouride do not strike me as top contenders. I believe that some things were covered up during 911, but not the entire plot. We have been watching to much tv, these theories are like a bad Austin Powers movie.

[tom502]

Well, you gotta agree, he makes the world a bit more interesting.

[truthwolf1]

I really like where he is going with this but the US will never allow the UN to do it and I would also agree we should not have foreigners do it. It will have to be done by ourselves. It is really important to stop the ADL before they initiate into American law "thought crime prison terms", for investigating the Holocaust/911.

Ahmadinejad, who has in the past cast doubt over the U.S. version of the Sept. 11 attacks, called for establishment of an independent fact-finding U.N. body to probe the attacks and stop it from turning into another sacred issue where "expressing opinion about it won't be banned".

[tom502]

It would have to be a truely independent group to do it. Any official gevernment group would simply give us what they already have. And I bet they would say it's a matter of national security that whatever "evidence" may still exist, cannot be examined.

[truthwolf1]

It would have to be a truely independent group to do it. Any official gevernment group would simply give us what they already have. And I bet they would say it's a matter of national security that whatever "evidence" may still exist, cannot be examined.

Yup.

[sgreger1]

You guys are dreaming. First of all they already got rid of the evidence. Anything else they have including tapes would never find themselves in the hands of investigators or in a court room because of national security. There would be nothing to investigate. That's the thing, if something did happen, it's gone. There is no way this will ever happen, no matter how big the 9-11 truth lobby gets, because it can't be done.

[devilock76]

It would have to be a truely independent group to do it. Any official gevernment group would simply give us what they already have. And I bet they would say it's a matter of national security that whatever "evidence" may still exist, cannot be examined.

Could there ever truly be such an independent group for these things to the level their effects have permeated the global political/social/economic strata?

Ken

[sgreger1]

It would have to be a truely independent group to do it. Any official gevernment group would simply give us what they already have. And I bet they would say it's a matter of national security that whatever "evidence" may still exist, cannot be examined.

Yah all we need is a truly independent group and a unicorn. The unicorn i think we can manage, but the truly independent group is a myth which I don't think has any basis in reality.

Lets say you chose 10 Americans at random to do an investigation. If there were such an elaborate conspiracy being covered up, than someone would get to those 10 people.

[MGX]

One could, say, hire some top notch PhD structural engineers to investigate...wait, that's been done.

When the scientists and engineers start screaming 'cover up', then I'll be concerned (Surely they're all spending their government hush money in paradise resorts ). However don't misunderstand - I fully support the fringe as their theories are entertaining.

[truthwolf1]

One could, say, hire some top notch PhD structural engineers to investigate...wait, that's been done.

When the scientists and engineers start screaming 'cover up', then I'll be concerned (Surely they're all spending their government hush money in paradise resorts ). However don't misunderstand - I fully support the fringe as their theories are entertaining.

I am glad they are entertaining to you. GO FRINGE YOURSELF!

James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST's investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.

http://www2.ae911truth.org/info/12

[bipolarbear1968]

[MGX]

I am glad they are entertaining to you. GO FRINGE YOURSELF!

James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST's investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.

http://www2.ae911truth.org/info/12

His main point is addressed immediately afterward his statements in the document. The first point is intelligible. Perhaps it was a mistake but #1 makes little sense. He does have good credentials, U of Maryland is a well regarded fire protection engineering school (one of very few in the world). However a few questions doesn't negate column buckling; the FEA [finite element analysis] is the best we have but with any iterative solution; garbage in, garbage out. I've seen the FEA and it makes sense. The fellow's concerns don't amount to a government cover up and towards the end of his testimony he's pandering for more money.

[raptor]

Yes, Reagan was a shining beacon of asdfhgahasghag

[sgreger1]

Yes, Reagan was a shining beacon of asdfhgahasghag

Just out of curiosity, what was your beef with reagan?

For me it was the big government, overspending, hyper comministophobic atmosphere. but I think he was the Obama of the right. When republicans hear him they like him and want to trust him, even if his record isn't perfect.

/The gipper