CA judge overturns "No Gay Marriage" law

[Bigblue1]

Pot kettle black,,, is all

[Bigblue1]

And way to go with picking out a lil part of what I said as that's all I said, I would figure you of all people stew would not pull a straw man routine......

[Bigblue1]

Oh and I've been pretty transperant on the board about my employment situation, which is Technically unemployed but creatively employed none the less, and for future knowledge, i have never even asked for gubment dollars one way or another, but I choose not to judge those who paid into it indirectly if they need to, especially if they have kids.....

[Bigblue1]

And no to the tax situation, It has nothing to do with you getting yours, the point was.
why do you get exemptions and I don't, not your fault guy, but it makes no sense, why a single guy pays more taces than a married guy. If you can explain that to me,,,, please do....

[Bigblue1]

oh and I know of no one who's been on unemployment for more than to years,, but most who are pushing 2 years have already been working part time but still get to claim almost all if not all of their claimage....

[Bigblue1]

I've covered this shit in the chatbox, ask lx if you want to know more.....

[sgreger1]

And no to the tax situation, It has nothing to do with you getting yours, the point was.
why do you get exemptions and I don't, not your fault guy, but it makes no sense, why a single guy pays more taces than a married guy. If you can explain that to me,,,, please do....

Sure, its simple. Back when all these laws were being figured out, the man used to be the sole bread winner, he supported the whole family. Children cost money and create no wealth, but the gov needs kids to fill jobs and to grow the country, therefore gov says we will ask less from you because you are already burdened with the cost of having children. This is a mutually beneficial agreement because the gov realises my burden of having mouths to feed, and in return i supply a kid who will someday work and generate wealth.

Same with marriage. Back in the day when the man married, he took on the burden (financially) of a wife, therefore it was the same arrangement; the gov sees my burden and asks less tax of me and in return i will be supporting a family that will likely go on to man assembly lines and create wealth which us good for the government.


With dual incomes this becomes an outdated tax policy. If you could calm down for a minute you would see that i am NOT IN FAVOR of married couples getting any special treatment. My wife works so there is no hardship for me marrying, however since this is available to me i take it because i pay plenty of taxes for shit ill never get back, so why not take mine when it comes along.

[sgreger1]

oh and I know of no one who's been on unemployment for more than to years,, but most who are pushing 2 years have already been working part time but still get to claim almost all if not all of their claimage....

My uncle has been on it for 4 years. Getting around limits is easy. Hes not even married and has no kids too. His 4 years just ran out so he moved back in with his dad at the age of 40 something. (sucks, i know). You of all people should know that there are always loopholes and exemptions for people to exploit. ( dont think they dont exploit them whenever possible either).

[sgreger1]

Pot kettle black,,, is all

No, not pot and kettle. I am not asking for money from the gov, my dependant just allows the gov to ask less money than me. Quit being an uptight bastard, having kids aint free and therefore since its in both of our intirests that i have kids, the gov lessens my burden. This is different than me asking for a check. Im not taking your money, im just giving less of mine.

[sgreger1]

I'm Just saying, And most likely most people who are on unemployment Have kids, But If you are getting an unfair advantage in taxes because you decided to procreate, you shouldn't talk shit about others, just saying, nothing personal.......

Explain to me how it is an unfair advantage? I get less taxes taken out because i have a mouth to feed, i dont get a check or anything, and my kid will someday grow up and create wealth, so the gov makes it easier for those who have kids. Listen to blue on his high horse defending the gov taking money, you should be glad there are ways to get LESS taxes taken out.

No kids = no economy. With the US not reproducing quickly enough, this means gov wants you to have kids.

[sgreger1]

No marriage + no kids = less population

This = win for the NWO right blue?

[Simplysnus]

I would never answer that q on an open forum, but i have to ask what difference would it make to my point? Weather on the top or bottom I would still pay more taxes than a married kid(s) having in the same situation...... Which means I am contributing to others welfare by default......

Because people in the top are already paying for people who are not in the top, thus if you aren't in the top then you're on welfare too apparently. By having tiered tax brackets, ANYONE not in the top is being subsidized and is on welfare.

[Simplysnus]

I think it's funny how much information people are willing to share, and then draw the line at, lol.

[Snussles]

I am glad I always was taught to put my faith into science rather than religion. Kind of nice walking around now and accepting everyone with equality and what not. And everytime I hear about this gay marriages debate, I just point and laugh at those opposing it and go one with my straight and uneffected life.

Seriously, don't you have jobs and marriages of your own, reffering to the straight people. Fix your own shit, this country has a seriously high divorce rate, and then you can worry about minorities getting married.

[tom502]

Getting rewarded for having kids, and more kids, is just bad, and has added to the ruin of the country.

Civil Unions should be a legal alternative for "marriage" for all consenting adults, including polygamists.