Does Obama Hate Black People?

[wa3zrm]

Does Obama Hate Black People?
American Thinker ^ | 5/29/2010 |
Posted on Saturday, May 29, 2010 10:03:48 AM
With his actions as an Illinois state senator, U.S. senator, and now president, Barack Obama has rightfully earned his title as the most pro-abortion politician in American history, but a congressional report asserts that his advocacy for a new abortion policy in his "home country of Kenya" (according to Michelle Obama) may have broken the law.

A federal probe into whether the Obama Administration broke federal laws by promoting a proposed constitution that radically changes abortion policy in Kenya was requested by three high ranking lawmakers with congressional oversight responsibilities.

...
As Dr. Alveda King -- niece of a real black leader, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.-- once said, "The great irony, is that abortion has done what the Klan only dreamed of."
Obama massages and kisses the foreheads of his black children each night as he tucks them in for bed, but then he leaves the room and thinks about the black "human weeds" of the world, who should never receive the same affection; he's apparently even willing to break the law to see to it.

[tom502]

I think overpopulation is a big problem, esp amoung 3rd world nations and the poor.

[Big L]

Obama hates black people because he's pro-abortion?? That doesn't even begin to make sense.

[tom502]

It doesn't, it's a tactic the anti-abortionists use.

[Roo]

I couldn't be more pro-abortion. Overpopluation will be the root problem of whatever eventually brings us down. And this "article" is absolutely meaningless on every level. Wa3zrm, please explain.

[wa3zrm]

Wa3zrm, please explain.

Here is the full text from American Thinker:
Does Obama Hate Black People?

J.C. Arenas
With his actions as an Illinois state senator, U.S. senator, and now president, Barack Obama has rightfully earned his title as the most pro-abortion politician in American history, but a congressional report asserts that his advocacy for a new abortion policy in his "home country of Kenya" (according to Michelle Obama) may have broken the law.

A federal probe into whether the Obama Administration broke federal laws by promoting a proposed constitution that radically changes abortion policy in Kenya was requested by three high ranking lawmakers with congressional oversight responsibilities.

In a letter to Inspectors General (IG) of the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Reps. Chris Smith (NJ-04), Darrell Issa (CA-49) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (FL-18) said: "Kenya's new proposed constitution, which will be subject to a public referendum in August 2010, includes two articles that, if adopted, would enshrine a new constitutional right to abortion in Kenya and dramatically change Kenya's abortion law."

The lawmakers wrote, "The Obama Administration's advocacy in support of Kenya's proposed constitution may constitute a serious violation of the Siljander Amendment and, as such, may be subject to civil and criminal penalties under the Antideficiency Act.

"Kenya's current constitution includes no reference to abortion and abortion is not legally permitted in Kenya except to save the life of the mother."

Under the Siljander Amendment, no funds for foreign assistance may be used to lobby for or against abortion, and Smith has discovered that the Obama Administration has spent over $10 million to promote the new Kenyan constitution. When Iranians took to the streets to oppose the fraudulent re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, it was Obama who didn't want to be seen as "meddling", but apparently that non-meddling policy doesn't apply to Kenya.

Granted, one of Obama's first decisions following his inauguration as the nation's 44th president was a repeal of the "Mexico City policy" -which prohibited the use of U.S. taxpayer money to fund international pro-abortion groups - but, one has to question why he's so interested in changing abortion policy specifically in Kenya.

Kanye West can't be here with us today, so in his place, I'll make the same assertion that the loudmouth rapper famously asserted about George W. Bush; Obama hates black people.

The president has expanded the welfare state, the unemployment rolls, and advocated against school voucher programs, all issues which disproportionately affect blacks. His position on abortion is perhaps the most alarming because it has become evident that he is using all the resources available to him to ensure that black babies here and abroad never reach their first breath.

Yet, in the midst of all of these issues, Black Americans continue to blindly support the president and his radical agenda.

Why?

As Dr. Alveda King -- niece of a real black leader, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.-- once said, "The great irony, is that abortion has done what the Klan only dreamed of."

Obama massages and kisses the foreheads of his black children each night as he tucks them in for bed, but then he leaves the room and thinks about the black "human weeds" of the world, who should never receive the same affection; he's apparently even willing to break the law to see to it.

The reason I posted it was to provoke thought and offer a forum for discussion on an offbeat topic.

[sgreger1]

I couldn't be more pro-abortion. Overpopluation will be the root problem of whatever eventually brings us down. And this "article" is absolutely meaningless on every level. Wa3zrm, please explain.

I too am cool with people getting abortions, it's a self-fixing problem, but I would like to point out that the myth of overpopulation is a myth. I'll post the study on it later but at current birth rates the world will actually decrease in population over the next 50 years due to cultures changing and people not having 6 kids anymore. I didn't believe it either but apparently theres a large amount of research pointing to this conclusion. I suppose this is good news but if unwanteds want to abort their children that is their prerogative and I have no problem with it.

I think the intention of the article is that blacks genocide themselves by having the most abortions, but I don't have a problem with that since it's all voluntary and adults may do as they please.

[lxskllr]

I too am cool with people getting abortions, it's a self-fixing problem, but I would like to point out that the myth of overpopulation is a myth. I'll post the study on it later but at current birth rates the world will actually decrease in population over the next 50 years due to cultures changing and people not having 6 kids anymore. I didn't believe it either but apparently theres a large amount of research pointing to this conclusion. I suppose this is good news but if unwanteds want to abort their children that is their prerogative and I have no problem with it.

I think the intention of the article is that blacks genocide themselves by having the most abortions, but I don't have a problem with that since it's all voluntary and adults may do as they please.

There's already overpopulation, this isn't something we need to wait for. Sitting in traffic, waiting in line, people starving... It's pretty clear to me there's already too many people. Think of a high population land animal. How about a squirrel? There's a crap load of them. How many squirrels did you see on your last drive? How does that compare with how many people you saw?

[danielan]

I wonder if the same theory holds for liberals?

If liberals are more likely to abort their children.
And children of liberals are more likely to be liberal.
then...
Ultimately we get less liberals?

[danielan]

Sitting in traffic, waiting in line, people starving... It's pretty clear to me there's already too many people.

Sure, but we tend to crowd up against one another. There is still huge amounts of open spaces. I think this daily crowding will ease as Internet penetration increases and you can make a living in the middle of the US. I think we're seeing the beginnings of this over the past decade.

We're probably still less then an hundred people per square mile when you average it out.

Starvation is almost always tied to bad government or war.

[lxskllr]

Starvation is almost always tied to bad government or war.

Nah, People starve because there's too many people to support the local food supply. Food can be had at very little cost if you can make it come out of the ground, or get it it from the water/land. The Chesapeake bay's been decimated because there's too many people. People are starving in Africa because there's too many of them, and the land can't support them. Water tables are dropping, and much of the water we have is unusable. We've eliminated most of the natural constraints on population. There more KIDS now than there were people in the USA circa 1910. Population growth SLOWING isn't a population DECREASE.

[danielan]

Population IS decreasing in several large countries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...on_growth_rate

Growth rates are also declining in many others.

Here's a list of the countries with famine issues: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...dernourishment

If there are any particularly well run countries on that list in the top half or so, let me know (let's say the top 20 or 30).

While saying "People starve because there is not enough food" seems logical and simple... During many (possibly most - but I don't have time to look them up) famines, food is actually exported from the stricken areas during their famines. Total agricultural output often stays the same or increases during famines.

We saw a little bit of this a couple years ago with ethanol. Corn that would have normally been sold at a low price for food was diverted at a higher price for ethanol production which increased the price of corn on the market and led to food riots in Mexico. You also see this in Central America with coffee. You should be able to get GREAT coffee in Central America. Instead it is all sold to the US as an export crop and in Central America you normally get crappy instant coffee.

The linkage between government policies and economic results is a very common cause and IMO much more of an issue then isolated crop failures or presumed overpopulation.

If you're running a central African nation and want to have a war, you need to sell all of your food to others to raise hard currency to import guns = famine.

If you're a corrupt dictator and you want to make your own Godzilla movie, you need to sell all of your food to others to raise hard currency to pay for your movie = famine.

If you're a benevolent leader of a poor country and your crops fail = bring in international aid for a season or 2.

Even the Ethiopian famine was more about the civil war then it was any local or regional lack of food (Why shoot your enemies when you can starve them?).

[lxskllr]

Again, it comes back to food being free. If you can't grow/hunt/fish food because it isn't there, that means there's too many people for the given area.

As far as the list goes, anything over 0% is too much, and most of the list is over 0%.

[danielan]

Again, it comes back to food being free. If you can't grow/hunt/fish food because it isn't there, that means there's too many people for the given area.

LOL, not really Malthus.

If we were animals you might be right.

Instead we organize ourselves for the efficiencies that come with task specialization. But yea, if the population of the US tried to feed itself with backyard gardens and hunting squirrels then yea, we'd starve.

[Kvlt]

It is true that abortion targets minorities, but that is a good thing. Less on the welfare system.

We do need to start killing the whores that abuse the system though. Two birds, one stone.