'We Do' Campaign: Gay Couples In The South Apply For Marriage Licenses, Get Rejected

[GoVegan]

That's not consensual. Animals aren't competent to enter into a contract.

It gives new meaning to the term 'doggy style"

[Crow]

You blew the dog whistle...!

Snusdog in 3...2...1......!

[Frankie Reloaded]

We're talking about two consenting adults who love each other.

So a single adult human citizen is denied his inalienable right to marry a consenting adult pet? Consent can be expressed in various ways, but what´s more important, you cannot discriminate people just because their partner is a beast...

[Crow]

So a single adult human citizen is denied his inalienable right to marry a consenting adult pet? Consent can be expressed in various ways, but what´s more important, you cannot discriminate people just because their partner is a beast...

Care to explain how a non-human animal can legally consent to a contract of marriage?

[lxskllr]

So a single adult human citizen is denied his inalienable right to marry a consenting adult pet? Consent can be expressed in various ways, but what´s more important, you cannot discriminate people just because their partner is a beast...

Again, it isn't consensual. Would you buy a house from a dog? How can the dog express his desire to sell? How do you determine the asking price? What's your recourse if the house has defects?

[Frankie Reloaded]

By animal means. How can a dog consent to going out for a walk? That is just technicality. The idea is whether marriage is a bond between man and woman or whether it is a relation between man and anything/woman and anything.

Some people have really strange sex lives and it is none of my business. But when a group with a strange sex life tries to steal a religious concept of marriage for their twisted agenda, I do not like it.

BTW, how about bigamy? Husband and five wives, wife and five husbands? Is that included in the inalienable rights package for southern states, too? It´s completely natural phenomenon and fully legal in both Jajakistan and the United Liliput Mirates.

[lxskllr]

BTW, how about bigamy? Husband and five wives, wife and five husbands? Is that included in the inalienable rights package for southern states, too? It´s completely natural phenomenon and fully legal in both Jajakistan and the United Liliput Mirates.

I have no issue with that.

[GoVegan]

I do! 1 wife can be hard enough!

[Frankie Reloaded]

@GoVegan: You can also include another husband or four


I also wanted to mention where these seemingly innocuous homosexual initiatives eventually lead: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/reli...-is-a-sin.html That is why I believe those attempts are also my business and vote accordingly.

[Skell18]

Some people have really strange sex lives and it is none of my business. But when a group with a strange sex life tries to steal a religious concept of marriage for their twisted agenda, I do not like it.

What twisted agenda are you talking about? The right to be treated equally? Hardly twisted.

[lxskllr]

[B]
I also wanted to mention where these seemingly innocuous homosexual initiatives eventually lead: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/reli...-is-a-sin.html That is why I believe those attempts are also my business and vote accordingly.

No, that's what happens when you don't guard your rights with zeal; you lose them. In the USA, we still have free speech rights. That has nothing to do with queer marriage, and everything to do with core human rights.

[Frankie Reloaded]

What twisted agenda are you talking about? The right to be treated equally? Hardly twisted.

I am talking about twisted agenda which starts with "Human rights" and end with people like Åke Green being send to prison for quoting the Bible in a church. In other words about the agenda which aims for persecution of the Christians and packs it in nice humanistic phrases.

[Nuusku]

Care to explain how a non-human animal can legally consent to a contract of marriage?

^

[Frankie Reloaded]

No, that's what happens when you don't guard your rights with zeal; you lose them. In the USA, we still have free speech rights. That has nothing to do with queer marriage, and everything to do with core human rights.

Yup. As long as you do not quote the Bible, that is.

http://www.christianexaminer.com/Art..._May11_23.html California
http://theydontfoolme.com/454/pastor...bible-message/ Florida
http://www.conservativetruth.org/arc...07-28-02.shtml New York

So, free speech, really? In the USA? Are you sure that even with all those free speech laws reading Bible aloud is not a major crime?

[Duff338]

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...t-accepting-it