Romania is a poor but beautiful country that is continuosly growing economically, no need to hear your "hateful" opinions. (when you clearly have no idea of what Romanian education is)
Romania is a poor but beautiful country that is continuosly growing economically, no need to hear your "hateful" opinions. (when you clearly have no idea of what Romanian education is)
See now we see where the real negativity came from.
But you are right, where would the world be without Romanian... well s*** I am drawing a blank, wonder why...
If you study ancient Greek and Roman history, you'll learn that both civilizations declined because of changes in their traditional moral belief systems. The USA is headed down the same road... or in other words, "history tends to repeat itself!"
If you have any problems with my posts or signature
If you study ancient Greek and Roman history, you'll learn that both civilizations declined because of changes in their traditional moral belief systems. The USA is headed down the same road... or in other words, "history tends to repeat itself!"
I love you baby , what à words exactly moral , famaly, respect for older moral way of life the best words
If you study ancient Greek and Roman history, you'll learn that both civilizations declined because of changes in their traditional moral belief systems. The USA is headed down the same road... or in other words, "history tends to repeat itself!"
Lol wut? What history books are you reading that says the Greeks and Roman's declined because of changes in their moral beliefs? I am curious what exactly you are referring to, because I recall history painting a very different story about why those empires collapsed. I'd love to hear where you are coming from though since I am not particularly versed on either of those cultures.
Guilty as charged lol. No actually I get a lot done but some of these threads make me stop to hit F5 every like 2 minutes. Love when they happen on a Fridays especially.
Except that there is no evidence that a biblical flood ever occured. Question for your snusomatic, why do you believe this story over any of the other various bible stories in other religions?
If you notice I never even asked anyone to believe what i said. If you want to believe there is no evidence of the flood that is your right. I am not here to get you believe anything. From what I read in this thread it seems like a lot of people put their "faith" in things that cannot be proven and haven't been.
You imply that I said that I do. What makes you assume that? most religions dont use the Bible. such as what stories?
If you notice I never even asked anyone to believe what i said. If you want to believe there is no evidence of the flood that is your right. I am not here to get you believe anything. From what I read in this thread it seems like a lot of people put their "faith" in things that cannot be proven and haven't been.
You imply that I said that I do. What makes you assume that? most religions dont use the Bible. such as what stories?
I was just saying that there is no evidence of a worldwide flood. The issue has been studied before and scientists from many disciplines (namely archeology) believe there is no evidence for a worldwide flood, and that furthermore it would be impossible anyways. If there were a flood, it would be clearly seen in the genetic record, the fossil record, the geological record etc, but none of those records show anything that points to a flood occuring at any point in history that would match the story of the bible.
You imply that I said that I do. What makes you assume that?
You said:
Aliens did not create humans, God did. If Aliens had created humans they would never sent Jesus to live with the human morons. Aliens flood would have taken care of all humans for good. "Aliens" did live before and after the flood but they are called "sons of God".
So that's why I was assuming. Sorry if I misread.
And no most religions do not use the bible, but the stories in the bible are all plagiarized from earlier versions of the same stories that orriginated in egypt, in sumeria etc. The whole story of genesis in fact came from waaaay before the jews, which came way before the christians etc. But the flood story is a common theme in many different religions, so I was just asking why you believe one particular "holy" book's account of it over any other holy book? Why do you assume these books contain any wisdom or that their stories should be believed, even when there is direct evidence that it did not occur?
I was just saying that there is no evidence of a worldwide flood. The issue has been studied before and scientists from many disciplines (namely archeology) believe there is no evidence for a worldwide flood, and that furthermore it would be impossible anyways. If there were a flood, it would be clearly seen in the genetic record, the fossil record, the geological record etc, but none of those records show anything that points to a flood occuring at any point in history that would match the story of the bible.
You said:
So that's why I was assuming. Sorry if I misread.
And no most religions do not use the bible, but the stories in the
bible are all plagiarized from earlier versions of the same stories that orriginated in egypt, in sumeria etc. The whole story of genesis in fact came from waaaay before the jews, which came way before the christians etc. But the flood story is a common theme in many different religions, so I was just asking why you believe one particular "holy" book's account of it over any other holy book? Why do you assume these books contain any wisdom or that their stories should be believed, even when there is direct evidence that it did not occur?
No thanks. I know how to use google and read. sheeee. you must think everyone is a moron.
i made a statement. i even said i know yall wont believe this. i mentioned the flood. for some reason that bothered you. I told a story from the Bible that 99% of church goers don't even know exists. the main part of my story was right inline with this threads topic. No one said a word to me about my story other than you and that was about how the flood never happened, yada yada. THE WORLD WIDE flood. Did you read that in my post? You assumed I said a lot of things. I asked you to tell me what stories you meant and you *tell* me how the Bible plagiarized all of history.
Originally posted by sgreger1
And no most religions do not use the bible, but the stories in the
bible are all plagiarized from earlier versions of the same stories that orriginated in egypt, in sumeria etc. The whole story of genesis in fact came from waaaay before the jews, which came way before the christians etc. But the flood story is a common theme in many different religions, so I was just asking why you believe one particular "holy" book's account of it over any other holy book? Why do you assume these books contain any wisdom or that their stories should be believed, even when there is direct evidence that it did not occur?
why do i *assume* (i think you assume you know what i think) these books contain wisdom? I never said i think the books you name contain wisdom. You assumed since YOU think the Bible plagiarized those stories that I assume they contain wisdom or should be believed when (you say) there is direct evidence that it did not occur? do you not see how crazy that sounds? Direct evidence that something did NOT occur. hummmm. yea ok. you assume that i assume..... you heard some person on TV say something and now you generalize the Bible says it. not only that but that you can prove that something never happened because you have hard evidence to prove it never happened. oh boy.
Do you think you are the only one who has heard all these stories that the Bible plagiarized everyone? Please, that is third grader stuff. You can set back and cherry pick excepts from the Bible and turn it into a comic strip and I could too. You don't know enough of the overall Bible to make a judgment. The Bible is not what you think it is. and no I was not put here to teach you either. that's why the Bible is in English.
I entered this thread to have some input because i knew something about the topic that I thought maybe others might not heard of. Not to insult what *you believe*. I spent roughly 40 years with your thinking and yes I know all the stories.
No one says you have to believe anything. I am not here to answer your questions nor am I here get you to see things my way. I don't know why you feel the need to try and get me to defend mine. I added a post to this thread that was on topic. I have nothing else to offer this thread. If you want to know why I believe this or that way, read the Bible. It's all in there. Please go back to how Aliens from Stargate SG-1 created humans to mine gold for them to carry back to their mother planet to prevent global warming..... or something else you can prove.
No entity "created humans". All available evidence points to mankind being the result of a natural, evolutionary process. And no matter how many holy books you read or how many times you try to make telepathic contact with aliens from zeta reticuli, you will never find evidence to the contrary. Anybody who nevertheless believes in either of those nonsensical ideas is either incapable or unwilling to think these questions through on even the most basic level.
@Snusomatic: I'm interested to know why you keep referring to yourself as a moron?
Our current time understanding of how universe works is probably 1% of our future understanding.... Therefore I do not have an opinion on this but when I look at all the barbarism, stupidity and self destructive nature of the human kind, I am not surprised that some probable alien life avoids contact with us. We guys are dangerous, VERY DANGEROUS!
No entity "created humans". All available evidence points to mankind being the result of a natural, evolutionary process. And no matter how many holy books you read or how many times you try to make telepathic contact with aliens from zeta reticuli, you will never find evidence to the contrary. Anybody who nevertheless believes in either of those nonsensical ideas is either incapable or unwilling to think these questions through on even the most basic level.
This post has my vote, and i have nothing else to say ..... Apart from, i think religion started as a form of social control
Here's some chemical facts about nicotine.
This article is from Bodybuilding.com, and is a very neutral source that not only talk about the negative...
Comment