Thanks all, I was able to get it working with nano. It took me all night but I finally got a VNC connection going to my raspberry Pi, so now on my main computer I can just do my regular stuff and then run the Pi headless without a keyboard or monitor plugged in to it.
The one issue I am having with the Pi is that there is packet loss with the USB ports. It results in a bug where when you type, the key stays depressed and goes like thisssssssssssssssss. Verry annoying, it took me like 30 minutes to log in because I couldn't see if the keys were repeating at the password prompt (since the characters are hidden), so it rejected my password a hundred times since keys kept getting stuck. It's especially bad with a USB hub (powered) attached to it, for some reason the packet loss is even worse. I guess it's something the community will have to patch, but for right now the best way to access it is to just SHH into it or run a VNC session.
Step 2: Figure out how to get my wifi dongle working on it. I'm halfway there, I think by today I will finally have it working.
Why GNU/Linux Rocks
Collapse
X
-
If you don't have vim, substitute that with nano, or vi. Both of those should be installed.
Leave a comment:
-
Code:sudo vim /etc/apt/sources.list
Code:su -c 'vim /etc/apt/sources.list'
Leave a comment:
-
QUICk, I NEED HELP!I need to know how to add the following text to a text file via the CLICode:deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lxskllrI'd use quarters to activate the video. People could use that to recover funeral costs :^D
Ken
Leave a comment:
-
I'd use quarters to activate the video. People could use that to recover funeral costs :^D
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sgreger1This was the obvious solution, but in that scenario I am not adding anything and I think I would run into patent issues wouldn't I? By just taking their unit and installing it into something and calling it something else? I figured that by using a rpi and linux etc nothing would be proprietary and I wouldn't run into so man issues. A photo frame would be the easiest, except again it depends on the LCD. The main issue is that a regular photo frame isn't hardened to the weather or energy efficient. To get a weatherproof LCD and have it not be power hungry I would have to use a type of panel that I don't believe they currently make photo frames for.
@ Shiki: It would be a niche market, the idea came up at a funeral recently, with about 30% of the people thinking it was a good idea. I realize most people wouldn't like the idea but some people (like the funeral I was at) are super sentimental about things like that.
Ken
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sgreger1This was the obvious solution, but in that scenario I am not adding anything and I think I would run into patent issues wouldn't I? By just taking their unit and installing it into something and calling it something else? I figured that by using a rpi and linux etc nothing would be proprietary and I wouldn't run into so man issues. A photo frame would be the easiest, except again it depends on the LCD. The main issue is that a regular photo frame isn't hardened to the weather or energy efficient. To get a weatherproof LCD and have it not be power hungry I would have to use a type of panel that I don't believe they currently make photo frames for.
@ Shiki: It would be a niche market, the idea came up at a funeral recently, with about 30% of the people thinking it was a good idea. I realize most people wouldn't like the idea but some people (like the funeral I was at) are super sentimental about things like that.
Software patents are also notoriously unwieldy beasts. They are often granted simply for the concept, rather than the implementation, and companies write their applications in a vague manner intentionally because of this. It's entirely possible that someone has patented the idea of "displaying a slide show or movie upon a display embedded within a tombstone/memorial/mausoleum/whatever other relevant cemetary terms" and that you will be infringing their patent no matter how you go about doing this. You could create your own script that achieves this in an entirely novel fashion, which bears no similarity to how they have achieved it, and does the task far superior, and you'd still be in violation of such a patent if it exists. Don't mean to piss in your cheerios like this, but that's the way it is. That's also a large part of why you see people arguing that software patents should either be extremely restricted, or else done away with entirely. They stifle creativity and hinder advances in how we do things, so there is a large part of the open source community who would like to see them either changed significantly or just scrapped entirely, precisely because of situations like this. This is not at all uncommon. It's damn near impossible to write any software and be 100% sure that you're not infringing someone's patent somewhere. In most cases, you probably are, and unless you've got an army of patent lawyers specializing in software patents that you can pay to look over every software patent issued and tell you if you're in the clear, there's no practical way of knowing for sure. Basically, you've got to wait to be sued, and be prepared to settle and sign a licensing agreement, unless you feel you've got an exceptional case where you can either prove that you absolutely are not infringing, or that the original patent was improperly issued, and thus void.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by heppycatI'll put it another way: very large files are moved to the web server root and i use the browser on my pc to download them. Both the server and my pc are on the same internal lan. The web server has no access restrictions and the files are removed once downloaded.
Placing files in a folder accessible by a web browser is exactly the same as placing them in a folder accessible by an ftp client. A web browser is just an http client.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by devilock76I will go for an even simpler solution for the tombstone video. since you have to install an lcd screen anyway just install a digital photo frame. most ones today can play a video from an sd card.
Ken
@ Shiki: It would be a niche market, the idea came up at a funeral recently, with about 30% of the people thinking it was a good idea. I realize most people wouldn't like the idea but some people (like the funeral I was at) are super sentimental about things like that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sgreger1I have not tried http yet, I always just sftp things, is the other route faster? I am not familiar with using apache anything, is this something that can be accomplished via placing it in a specific folder on in the server or by using an FTP client?
Placing files in a folder accessible by a web browser is exactly the same as placing them in a folder accessible by an ftp client. A web browser is just an http client.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by devilock76I will go for an even simpler solution for the tombstone video. since you have to install an lcd screen anyway just install a digital photo frame. most ones today can play a video from an sd card.
Ken
Leave a comment:
-
I will go for an even simpler solution for the tombstone video. since you have to install an lcd screen anyway just install a digital photo frame. most ones today can play a video from an sd card.
Ken
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by heppycatThe url format is protocol://username@hostort. Username is not required, port is default for the protocol unless specified.
scp://server:4422 will (should) connect with scp to server on port 4422
I use winscp to transfer files between servers and my windows workstation. For large files such as a 20gb packet capture, i throw it in a public apache folder and use http.
For server to server transfers, command line scp. For large files or scheduled transfers, rsync.
In regards to this:
For large files such as a 20gb packet capture, i throw it in a public apache folder and use http.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sgreger1So in the ftp client, use scp://server when logging in? Or just connect via whichever port I have SSH opened to?ort. Username is not required, port is default for the protocol unless specified.
scp://server:4422 will (should) connect with scp to server on port 4422
I use winscp to transfer files between servers and my windows workstation. For large files such as a 20gb packet capture, i throw it in a public apache folder and use http.
For server to server transfers, command line scp. For large files or scheduled transfers, rsync.
Leave a comment:
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by wa3zrmBeta News ^ | The Windows XP death clock is ticking away. While Microsoft has extended support for malware protection, do not be fooled -- XP will...
-
Channel: People and World Around Us
-
-
by wa3zrmThe Modern Survivalist ^ |
It happened a few years ago during a trip to USA for the Self Reliance expo in Utah. After the expo we decided to...-
Channel: People and World Around Us
-
-
by CyId just thought Id share a story of my computer journey last night. When I first got my desktop it was a display at the store with windows vista. After...
-
Channel: People and World Around Us
-
-
by shikitohnoI'll admit, this is something that's been bugging me for a long time now. I saw a clip about this family just now, who got booted off a flight because...
-
Channel: People and World Around Us
-
-
by wa3zrmPolice hire 'Angel' to slow drivers on busy roads
newslite.tv ^ | May 11, 2010
Posted on Saturday, May 15, 2010 10:15:48 PM
...-
Channel: SNUSON Confessional
16-05-10, 04:45 AM -
- Loading...
- No more items.
Links:
BuySnus.com |
SnusExpress.com |
SnusCENTRAL.com |
BuySnus EU |
BuySnus.at |
BuySnus.ch |
SnusExpress.ch
Leave a comment: