Apparently the NY Post just couldn't be bothered to make an effort the other day.
This was their headline story the other day, across two pages. The front page said "Should the leader of the free world dress like this – even on vacation?"
Honestly, that's fµ¢ḱing laziness right there. There are plenty of easy, legitimate reasons to criticize Obama, and they decide the best one for a headline is the fact that he wore flip-flops to the beach? That's like making your greatest criticism of Stalin the fact that he was rarely clean-shaven. I don't know how a rag like the NY Post is still a viable business, but I'm hoping they (and all their readers) spontaneously combust from an excess accumulation of sheer stupidity.
This was their headline story the other day, across two pages. The front page said "Should the leader of the free world dress like this – even on vacation?"
Honestly, that's fµ¢ḱing laziness right there. There are plenty of easy, legitimate reasons to criticize Obama, and they decide the best one for a headline is the fact that he wore flip-flops to the beach? That's like making your greatest criticism of Stalin the fact that he was rarely clean-shaven. I don't know how a rag like the NY Post is still a viable business, but I'm hoping they (and all their readers) spontaneously combust from an excess accumulation of sheer stupidity.
Comment