Welcome to Sweden of Today

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hanske
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 425

    #31
    In the UK, the government's actually operating muslim schools.

    Comment

    • Frosted
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 5798

      #32
      Originally posted by Hanske View Post
      In the UK, the government's actually operating muslim schools.
      Muslim schools are entitled to exactly the same funding as Catholic schools, Jewish schools etc. etc.

      Personally I hate all faith schools.

      Comment

      • Hanske
        Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 425

        #33
        Originally posted by Frosted View Post
        Muslim schools are entitled to exactly the same funding as Catholic schools, Jewish schools etc. etc.

        Personally I hate all faith schools.
        Ok, so the government's just paying for some of the expensives? We have protestant, catholic and other private schools here in Norway, but they only get supported if they're following the official curriculum in all subjects apart from religion. We also have German, French and English schools, but they get support from their homecountry. The government's not allowing muslim schools, as those who has tried to open them have had radical views on important things in the Norwegian society. Of course, that's allowed, but we don't want a school where the boys are told to stone every girl who wears make-up.

        Comment

        • tom502
          Member
          • Feb 2009
          • 8985

          #34
          I think it is "racism", but not like we are led to believe, that's it's redneck honkies that don't want dem mooslems. It's racist, because the zionist led leftist politicians have an agenda to displace the indigenous ethnicities of Europe with poor Muslim "immigrants". Same in the USA with the Mexicans. It's all a master plot, to "genocide" the people of European descent, because the "masters that be behind the scenes" want to use the social conflict, and division to further their aims of world control.

          Comment

          • Hanske
            Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 425

            #35
            Originally posted by justintempler View Post
            If I am correct in my assumption...


            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway

            Norway has a distinct advantage, it uses the income derived from its natural resources to pay for its social welfare programs. It doesn't have to resort to immigration to fund those programs.
            It's not that Sweden is doing anything "wrong", Sweden doesn't have those advantages derived from natural resources, hence more immigration, hence higher levels of crime from immigrants.
            You're right, but Norway has also had many disadvantages. Like the WW2. Sweden was neutral. That's bad enough. How can a country be neutral in a war like that? "Ah, it doesn't affect us, we don't care". Norway has had to rebuild many towns, without Swedish help. They actually let German trains go through Sweden and into Norway, and reported the Norwegians that escaped to the Gestapo. Like I see it, Sweden are the only ones that's managed to operate as the world's only neutral nazis.

            Comment

            • lxskllr
              Member
              • Sep 2007
              • 13435

              #36
              Originally posted by Hanske View Post
              You're right, but Norway has also had many disadvantages. Like the WW2. Sweden was neutral. That's bad enough. How can a country be neutral in a war like that? "Ah, it doesn't affect us, we don't care". Norway has had to rebuild many towns, without Swedish help. They actually let German trains go through Sweden and into Norway, and reported the Norwegians that escaped to the Gestapo. Like I see it, Sweden are the only ones that's managed to operate as the world's only neutral nazis.
              Neutral is neutral. I don't have a problem with that. If more countries minded their own business and stayed neutral, the world would be a better place.

              There's something to be said for good, honest conquest. You go in with guns, and manpower, and take what you can(if you can). That's better than scurrying around behind the scenes like rats, and stealing with a pen.

              Comment

              • GoVegan
                Member
                • Oct 2009
                • 5603

                #37
                Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
                Neutral is neutral. I don't have a problem with that. If more countries minded their own business and stayed neutral, the world would be a better place.

                There's something to be said for good, honest conquest. You go in with guns, and manpower, and take what you can(if you can). That's better than scurrying around behind the scenes like rats, and stealing with a pen.
                Feeling a bit passive aggressive?

                Comment

                • lxskllr
                  Member
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 13435

                  #38
                  Originally posted by GoVegan View Post
                  Feeling a bit passive aggressive?
                  I guess I was just mashing two thoughts into one. Some people will always want other people's stuff. The way it's usually done now, is it's taken from them through "laws". Imo, the honorable thing to do is take it by force. The BEST thing to do is not want other people's stuff. Deal with what you've got in the open, and treat other nations as equals.

                  Comment

                  • ABW
                    Member
                    • May 2011
                    • 793

                    #39
                    Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
                    Some people will always want other people's stuff.
                    Kinda like I want all your Snus.. watch out lxskllr!!

                    Comment

                    • GoVegan
                      Member
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 5603

                      #40
                      Originally posted by ABW
                      Kinda like I want all your Snus.. watch out lxskllr!!
                      Now thats funny!

                      You know what scary? I saw a newscast on TV yesterday and NATO was questioning if we should get involved in Syria. I just thought to myself here we go again.

                      Comment

                      • Hanske
                        Member
                        • Jan 2011
                        • 425

                        #41
                        Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
                        Neutral is neutral. I don't have a problem with that. If more countries minded their own business and stayed neutral, the world would be a better place.

                        There's something to be said for good, honest conquest. You go in with guns, and manpower, and take what you can(if you can). That's better than scurrying around behind the scenes like rats, and stealing with a pen.
                        I'd have a problem with it. I'm against war. I wouldn't say I'm a passifist, but I'm against war, NATO, weapons and all that shit. I'm proud that together with the UK, the Norwegian police officers are the only unarmed police officers in the world. Guns and violence doesn't solve anything, but I believe in peaceful negotiations. But you can't negotiate if there's one bad guy, and everyone else is neutral.

                        Comment

                        • lxskllr
                          Member
                          • Sep 2007
                          • 13435

                          #42
                          I'd argue that violence solves everything. Sometimes it's a bitch slap, and sometimes it's a nuke, but violence can solve every issue, and is true to the human spirit.

                          Comment

                          • GoVegan
                            Member
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 5603

                            #43
                            Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
                            I'd argue that violence solves everything. Sometimes it's a bitch slap, and sometimes it's a nuke, but violence can solve every issue, and is true to the human spirit.
                            You reap what you sow. Sure, violence can be used to help solve our problems but at great expense. Besides that, violence provides more of a false peace. How many nations out there would just love to take a whack at us because of all the crap we get involved in? One of these days, they may have that opportunity.

                            Comment

                            • Hanske
                              Member
                              • Jan 2011
                              • 425

                              #44
                              That's one thing I've always been wanting an answer for. Why the heck is America involved in every little conflict on earth? "War on terror". Who's been the terrorists in that war? Yes, many was killed in the 9/11 attacks, but many more civillians have been killed by US/NATO attacks in the Middle East. And more have been tortured.

                              Comment

                              • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
                                Member
                                • Mar 2011
                                • 7035

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Hanske View Post
                                You're right, but Norway has also had many disadvantages. Like the WW2. Sweden was neutral. That's bad enough. How can a country be neutral in a war like that? "Ah, it doesn't affect us, we don't care". Norway has had to rebuild many towns, without Swedish help. They actually let German trains go through Sweden and into Norway, and reported the Norwegians that escaped to the Gestapo. Like I see it, Sweden are the only ones that's managed to operate as the world's only neutral nazis.
                                Yes and was it wrong Hanske? Was it wrong From our politions to have suche policy which was savior for Swedish nation? I Can not say anything about Swedes WHO reported to Gestapo ,i Do not know .

                                Comment

                                Related Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X