EU Snus Ban!?!

Collapse
X
Collapse
+ More Options
Posts
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 7035

    #16
    You right Frankie but your truth leaving me without hope

    Comment

    • Frankie Reloaded
      Banned Users
      • Jan 2011
      • 541

      #17
      I believe, Mr. GN, that the rest of us are losing hope, but your work/product might live long and prosper: in Russia. her market is huge and increasingly rich. Her health problems, especially for males, are notorically known to her leaders, and they might not be as easily manipulated by vile pressure groups as the Western politicians. Maybe we will even be able to buy Odens with the name in Cyrilic from Russian traders.

      https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/4002152960/h8C86678E/

      Comment

      • Mordred
        Member
        • Dec 2009
        • 342

        #18
        @Frankie: We're not slaves yet, but you are right, our influence on politics is minimal. It's strange, isn't it, that the EU makes the laws for everybody in every European nation, yet we cannot vote for anyone, only those of our nation? Why is this? Well, maybe, just maybe, if we could all vote for one dissenting voice, say Nigel Farrage, Daniel Hannan or whichever euro-skeptic willing to spearhead such a movement, we might be heard. Divide and conquer is a principle the EU understands very well.

        Comment

        • bill77.017
          Member
          • Jul 2010
          • 2279

          #19
          Originally posted by blotgode
          Trade Ewa Bjรถrling (M) has previously threatened "all-out war" if the EU does not open for the sale of snus.
          Right, it's D-day, i wish Ewa Bjรถrling every success in the battle against the EU w****ers. !!

          Comment

          • Skell18
            Member
            • May 2012
            • 7067

            #20
            Originally posted by Mordred
            @Frankie: We're not slaves yet, but you are right, our influence on politics is minimal. It's strange, isn't it, that the EU makes the laws for everybody in every European nation, yet we cannot vote for anyone, only those of our nation? Why is this? Well, maybe, just maybe, if we could all vote for one dissenting voice, say Nigel Farrage, Daniel Hannan or whichever euro-skeptic willing to spearhead such a movement, we might be heard. Divide and conquer is a principle the EU understands very well.

            Agreed

            Comment

            • Skell18
              Member
              • May 2012
              • 7067

              #21
              Originally posted by bill77.017
              Right, it's D-day, i wish Ewa Bjรถrling every success in the battle against the EU w****ers. !!
              Agreed

              Comment

              • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
                Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 7035

                #22
                Kommissionens fรถrslag: Smaksatt snus fรถrbjuds

                Vissa sorter av smaksatt snus kan nu fรถrsvinna fรถr gott.
                Det stรฅr klart nรคr EU-kommissionen i dag presenterar sitt fรถrslag till nytt tobaksdirektiv.
                Samtidigt finns exportfรถrbudet pรฅ snus kvar - mot den svenska regeringens vilja.
                Det svenska snusets framtid har diskuterats flitigt under hรถsten. I dag presenteras EU-kommissionens fรถrslag till ett nytt tobaksdirektiv.
                Aftonbladet har tidigare avslรถjat att kommissionen planerat att fรถrbjuda smaktillsatser i tobaksprodukter inom EU, vilket skulle kunna slรฅ ut mรฅnga svenska snussorter.
                Inget undantag fรถr svenskt snus
                Klockan 12.30 i dag presenterade kommissionรคren Tonio Borg EU-kommissionens fรถrslag till nytt tobaksdirektiv. Dรคr slรฅs fast att "produkter med karaktรคristiska smaker" inte ska kunna sรคljas - vilket รคven ska gรคlla snuset.
                โ€“ Konsumenterna fรฅr inte bli lurade. Tobaksprodukter ska se ut som och smaka som tobaksprodukter. Detta fรถrslag sรคkerstรคller att attraktiv paketering och smaksรคttning inte anvรคnds som en marknadsfรถringsstrategi, sa hรคlsokommissionรคr Tonio Borg i ett uttalande.
                "Fรถrslaget fรถrbjuder inte specifika smaker men fรถrbjuder tobaksprodukter med sรฅ kallad karaktรคriserande smak, inklusive mentol. Rent konkret kan mentol i smรฅ mรคngder anvรคndas, men inte i stora kvantiteter som ger tobaksprodukten en smak som รคr annorlunda รคn tobak", stรฅr ocksรฅ att lรคsa i ett pressmeddelande.
                Tidigare har uppgifterna om att detta skulle ske skapat stor ilska bland svenska EU-parlamentariker och bland mรฅnga svenska snusare. Mรฅnga av dem anser att fรถrslaget skulle slรฅ undan benen pรฅ det undantag gรคllande snus som Sverige har. Det fรถrhandlades fram nรคr Sverige gick med i unionen och gav oss en mรถjlighet att producera snus, nรฅgot som รคr fรถrbjudet i resten av EU. Flera EU-parlamentariker har sagt att man kommer gรฅ till offensiven nรคr tobaksdirektivet ska fรถrhandlas i EU-parlamentet.
                Fรถrslaget stรถtte direkt pรฅ kritik frรฅn den svenska tobaksbranschen.
                โ€“ Jag har otroligt svรฅrt att se att kommissionen slutligen kommer att lyckas reglera snuset รคven hรคr pรฅ hemmamarknaden. Men det รคr det fรถrsta fรถrslaget som lรคggs, det รคr nu som processen bรถrjar, nu ska parlamentet och ministerrรฅdet sรคga sitt, sรคger Patrik Hildingsson, informationschef pรฅ Swedish Match.
                EU-parlamentarikern Carl Schlyter (MP) hittar bรฅde positiva och negativa aspekter gรคllande snuset i det nya direktivsfรถrslaget.
                โ€“ Det รคr bra att man fรถrbjuder en massa smakรคmnen i cigaretter och tobak. Men det รคr ett tvetydigt undantag fรถr tobak och sรฅdana saker. Det stรฅr att tillsatser som behรถvs fรถr tillverkningen av produkten ska vara kvar. Jag tolkar det som att man fรฅr anvรคnda smakรคmnen om det krรคvs fรถr att gรถra snus, men inte vanilj, godis eller mint, sรคger han.
                Schlyter tycker dock att det beslutet ska tas i den svenska regeringen.
                โ€“ Jag tycker att vi kunde ta den diskussionen och bestรคmma det i Sverige, det hade varit det mest logiska. I princip har kommissionen inte fel, men beslutet bรถr fattas av Sverige i riksdagen, sรคger han.
                Exportfรถrbud stรฅr fast
                Fรถrutom hotet mot den svenska snuset pรฅ hemmaplan har den svenska regeringen ocksรฅ gรฅtt pรฅ offensiven nรคr det gรคller det exportfรถrbud pรฅ snus som rรฅder pรฅ EU:s inre marknad. Handelsminister Ewa Bjรถrling (M) har tidigare utlovat fullskaligt snuskrig om fรถrbudet blir kvar.
                โ€“ Nu har vi bedrivit en lรฅgintensiv konflikt i flera รฅr, pรฅ flera olika nivรฅer. Beroende pรฅ vad som stรฅr i det hรคr nya fรถrslaget frรฅn kommissionen till tobaksdirektiv รคr det fullskaligt krig som gรคller, inget annat, sa hon i fรถrra veckan.
                Och i EU-kommissionens fรถrslag till nytt tobaksdirektiv finns fรถrbudet kvar - mot den svenska regeringens vilja. Men Sverige fรฅr fortsatt producera snus fรถr eget bruk som tidigare.
                EU-kommissionens fรถrslag till nytt tobaksdirektiv รคr dock inte slutstationen fรถr direktivet. Det ska nu vidare till EU-parlamentet och ministerrรฅdet. De bรฅde mรฅste vara รถverens innan direktivet kan bli verklighet i unionen.

                Comment

                • lxskllr
                  Member
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 13435

                  #23
                  Originally posted by GN Tobacco Sweden AB
                  Kommissionens fรถrslag: Smaksatt snus fรถrbjuds ...
                  Google translated for the lazy...

                  Commission proposal: Flavored snuff ban

                  Some varieties of flavored snus can now disappear for good.
                  Clearly, when the European Commission today presented its proposal for a new tobacco directive.
                  Meanwhile, the export ban on snus left - against the Swedish government's will.
                  The Swedish snus future has been discussed extensively in the fall. Today the European Commission presented proposals for a new tobacco directive.
                  Aftonbladet has earlier revealed that the Commission planned to ban flavor additives in tobacco products within the EU, which could wipe out many Swedish snus.
                  No exception for Swedish snus
                  At 12:30 today announced the Commissioner Tonio Borg, the EU Commission proposed new tobacco directive. It states that "products with distinctive flavors" are not to be sold - which also applies to snuff.
                  - Consumers should not be fooled. Tobacco products should look like and taste like tobacco products. This proposal ensures that attractive packaging and flavors are not used as a marketing strategy, said Health Commissioner Tonio Borg said in a statement.
                  "The proposal does not prohibit specific tastes but prohibits tobacco products with so-called characterizing flavor, including menthol. Concretely, menthol in small quantities used, but not in large quantities gives tobacco product a flavor that is different than tobacco," is also read in a press release.
                  Previously, the information on this would be caused great anger among Swedish MEP and among many Swedish snus users. Many of them consider that the proposal would pull the rug on the exemption applicable snuff by Sweden. It was negotiated when Sweden joined the EU and gave us an opportunity to produce snuff, which is prohibited in the rest of the EU. Several MEPs have said that they will go on the offensive when the tobacco directive shall be negotiated in the EU Parliament.
                  The proposal came directly to the criticism from the Swedish tobacco industry.
                  - I have been incredibly difficult to see that the Commission will finally be able to regulate snuff even here domestically. But this is the first proposal that is added, it is now that the process begins, now the Parliament and the Council have their say, says Patrik Hildingsson, CIO at Swedish Match.
                  MEP Carl Schlyter (MP) find both positive and negative aspects regarding snus in the new proposal.
                  - It is good that it prohibits a lot of flavors in cigarettes and tobacco. But it is an ambiguous exception of tobacco and such things. It says that the additives necessary for production of the product will be left. I understand that you may use seasonings if necessary to make snuff, but not vanilla, candy or mint, he says.
                  Schlyter think, however, that the decision should be taken in the Swedish government.
                  - I think we could take this discussion and decide that in Sweden, it would be the most logical. In principle, the Commission is not wrong, but the decision should be taken by Sweden in parliament, he said.
                  Export ban stands
                  In addition to the threat to the Swedish snus at home, the Swedish government has also gone on the offensive when it comes to the export ban on snus prevailing on the European single market. Trade Ewa Bjรถrling (M) has previously pledged all-out war on snus ban remains.
                  - Now we are engaged in a low-intensity conflict for many years, on several different levels. Depending on what is in this new proposal from the Commission to the tobacco directive is the all-out war related, nothing else, she said last week.
                  And the European Commission's proposal for a new tobacco directive's ban left - against the Swedish government's will. But Sweden will continue to produce snus for personal use as before.
                  EU Commission proposed new tobacco directive is not the final stop for the directive. It will now go forward to the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers. They both have to agree before the Directive can be a reality in the Union.

                  Comment

                  • Frosted
                    Member
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5798

                    #24
                    I still don't get it. If they said that they'd restrict the flavourings and then legalise the sales I'd probably get it...but it's nothing of the sort. I'm never going to understand the cretins in the EU.

                    Comment

                    • hokiehi82
                      Member
                      • Jul 2012
                      • 227

                      #25
                      Ok guys. So I don't really understand european politics. What kind of timetable are we talking about on this directive and what chances of it getting shot down or modified before it's ratified?

                      Comment

                      • chainsnuser
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 1389

                        #26
                        Originally posted by hokiehi82
                        So I don't really understand european politics.
                        Me neither, but I've just read that the real directive is now expected for 2015.
                        After that the member states will have ten years to convert the directive into national law. So, in most countries it will be 2025 before anything changes.

                        Until then I hope that the general population will have become so disgusted by the work of the health nazis that everything will be abolished.
                        The (mostly self proclaimed) "experts" of Public Health are actually on a good way to discredit and ridicule their tax- and bribe-financed "movement" not only for us users of a niche-product but for virtually everybody.

                        BTW, here are links to the proposal:
                        http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/d...012_788_en.pdf
                        http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/p...n/index_en.htm


                        Cheers!

                        Comment

                        • Jan
                          Member
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 439

                          #27
                          Most importantly, it is not their intention to ban flavourings that are essential to produce snus (what a relief). Bergamot is probably there to stay and so is the rose oil. What they are fighting against is "overwhelming" flavour that would kill off tobacco taste completely thus making tobacco products taste like candies.
                          I don' t see SM and most other lines in danger... GN however will possibly have to reconsider taste profiles of some of their Extreme brands.

                          The article also comments on nicotine content of tobacco products. There will still be "light" versions of everything (lower nic content but warning lower does not mean less harmful). It says nothing about stronger than usual products however. I am afraid they may eventually try set limits to how much nic every product may legally contain... we will see.

                          Comment

                          • Skell18
                            Member
                            • May 2012
                            • 7067

                            #28
                            That proposal is a load of old tosh, were they high when they came up with those proposals? What the hell is a "novel tobacco product" a comedy cigar shaped like a cock? A book of tobacco leaves? utter bullshit!

                            Comment

                            • Skell18
                              Member
                              • May 2012
                              • 7067

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Jan
                              Most importantly, it is not their intention to ban flavourings that are essential to produce snus (what a relief). Bergamot is probably there to stay and so is the rose oil. What they are fighting against is "overwhelming" flavour that would kill off tobacco taste completely thus making tobacco products taste like candies.
                              I don' t see SM and most other lines in danger... GN however will possibly have to reconsider taste profiles of some of their Extreme brands.

                              The article also comments on nicotine content of tobacco products. There will still be "light" versions of everything (lower nic content but warning lower does not mean less harmful). It says nothing about stronger than usual products however. I am afraid they may eventually try set limits to how much nic every product may legally contain... we will see.
                              GN's stuff tastes primarily of tobacco with only a hint of the flavouring, its Jaks who need to worry about that.

                              Comment

                              • Jan
                                Member
                                • Oct 2008
                                • 439

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Skell18
                                GN's stuff tastes primarily of tobacco with only a hint of the flavouring, its Jaks who need to worry about that.
                                Skruf Cranberry too comes to my mind.. but again, its only a speculation for now.. directive has not been approved yet and it will not be for some time... I still hope Sweden would at least get an exception to the new rules as regards suns... and things will remain largely as they are now.

                                Comment

                                Related Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...