US, Few Others Object to Bolivia UN Coca-Chewing Bid

[tattooer601]

This is a lot like the EU ban of snus lol. "we have scientific evidence...biased and inaccurate evidence. Ban it! Unless you give us money."

+2
However this has been practice for a long time.
Company's that major stock holders are rooted or employed by the fda or the EU's equivalent..
These people all either deny new products the OK to sell.
These people overlook new applications so long that the applicant looses tons of money and gives up....
Either way the stock holders well vested in the government s system's.
Wins.
Weather it'd coca leaves or snus...
Coca leaves could reduce big pharma's$
Great snus could reduce big tobaccos $
Sorry to rant

[GN Tobacco Sweden AB]

This is a lot like the EU ban of snus lol. "we have scientific evidence...biased and inaccurate evidence. Ban it! Unless you give us money."

+1 ^^

[Reynard]

We drink coffee, let them have their coca leaves.

Some of us do both hehe

[Frankie Reloaded]

I think more than one of the objecting countries could do with a natural appetite-suppressant. With all the obesity etc...

[hokiehi82]

Whit is it our concern what the Bolivians do? This is the problem with these multinational bodies; countries surrendering their sovereignty to foreign interests.

[halocog]

This is a lot like the EU ban of snus lol. "we have scientific evidence...biased and inaccurate evidence. Ban it! Unless you give us money."

[Crow]

We drink coffee, let them have their coca leaves.

I couldn't agree more!

[OregonNative]

We drink coffee, let them have their coca leaves.

[Crow]

By Phillip Smith, Stop the Drug War



Four Western countries—the US, Britain, Italy, and Sweden—have formally objected to Bolivia's rejoining the 1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs with a reservation that allows for the traditional habit of coca leaf chewing, the Transnational Institute reported Friday. The move is the latest twist in the Latin American nation's effort to remove the international proscription on the ancestral habit.

But the Western objections are far from sufficient. Another 58 signatory countries would have to object by next week to block Bolivia's bid, and there is little sign of that happening.

Coca leaf, the raw material from which cocaine is produced, has been used with little ill effect as a hunger-suppressant and mild stimulant for thousands of years in South America's Andean region. It was included as a proscribed substance in the 1961 Convention based on a 1950 study that has been found to be unscientific and blatantly prejudiced. The 1961 Convention called for the chewing of coca leaf to be phased out by 1989.

Led by former coca grower union leader Evo Morales, Bolivia tried in 2011 to amend the 1961 Single Convention to remove the provision requiring it to ban coca leaf chewing. If no countries objected, the request would have been automatically granted, but the US, supported by the International Narcotics Control Board organized a "friends of the convention" group to rally against the move. In all, 18 countries objected to Bolivia's request.

Among Latin American countries, only Mexico's conservative government objected. Colombia objected at first, but withdrew its objection, while Costa Rica, Ecuador, Uruguay, and Venezuela went on record supporting Bolivia's request even though they weren't required to. The objecting countries were all European, except for Canada and the US and Japan and Singapore.

Following the failure of its effort to amend the 1961 Convention, Bolivia withdrew from it and requested re-accession with a reservation regarding the coca chewing provision. The Convention allows for such a procedure, which can be blocked only if one-third of the member states object. There are 184 countries that have signed the Convention, meaning 62 must object to stop Bolivia's re-accession.

So far, only four have done so. Other countries have only until January 10 to weigh in.

Source