Neanderthal: New Images of an Ancient Enemy

[sgreger1]

I thought the Bible was officially messed with from it's original version so you really cannot take it word for word anyways.


Is it bad to not believe in all the science or the many words in the good book? Can I just make something up and be happier with myself?

I like the creationist force/evolution/alien manipulation/evolution/evolution spiritualism coming next timeline.

Can I just make something up and be happier with myself?

Sure, if you want to close your eyes and believe in something that isn't real than you are more than free too. What's that word you use so often, sheeple I think it was? lololol. You can't really not believe in science without purposely burying your head in the sand, BUT, science certainly is in it's infancy and I think it's too soon to assume we've figured out everything. I think things like the FTL barrier will be cracked some day for example, and that many things which seem impossible today may be possible in the future.

I thought the Bible was officially messed with from it's original version so you really cannot take it word for word anyways.

Aside form the fact that no book from thousands of years ago has any validity as far as beign a source of accurate history or explanation of the universe, yes the bible is a forgery that was ripped from many past cultures (the torah is anyways). The new testament is like the mormons, they kind of came along and said "yo we got this totally new part of the bible that is the NEW gospel man, believe this part now".

The jews copied from the sumerians, the muslims and christians made up their own versions, the mromons then made up their own versions etc. None of these books are credible regarding anything. They mention a few cities and kings that did exist, but that is to be expected since they were written by people during those times. If I wrote a crazy new religion today (like scientology), it would include an accurate mention of the united states, the current leaders etc, but that would be the only factual part of the whole book.

[truthwolf1]

I thought the Bible was officially messed with from it's original version so you really cannot take it word for word anyways.


Is it bad to not believe in all the science or the many words in the good book? Can I just make something up and be happier with myself?

I like the creationist force/evolution/alien manipulation/evolution/evolution spiritualism coming next timeline.

[sgreger1]

I had to google "snarky" to understand what that means. If it means sarcastic, yeah, I'm being snarky.


I remember telling me on Sunday School that God created the world in seven days:

On Monday, He created light, Earth, Sun and the Moon.
On Tuesday, He created the seas, rivers and lakes.
On Wednesday, He created the plants, trees and flowers.
On Thursday, He created the flying creatures and insects.
On Friday, He created the land creatures.
On Saturday, He created the humans and other commands.
On Sunday, He rested.

When I questioned my teological teacher (I dont know the correct word for that in english) about dinosaurs and their bones, she punished me and told my mother. I was 8 years old.

Sometimes that story pops in my head and that's why I said what I said.

Oh lol, I had to ask because I actually know people who think that way so you can never be sure lol. In America the vast majority of private schools are christian schools (mainly catholic), and since I lived in a bad neighborhood my parents sent me to there since they provided a better education. The only snag was that they were, well, christian schools so they taught this kind of stuff. I remember when my teacher in I believe it was 4th grade told me the same thing, the dinosaur fossils were planted by the devil to test our fate. Even at hat age I was like "lol, wait no one actually believes this do they?", but she was dead serious. It's amazing how some people think, those evil scientists must have planted those bones with the help of the devil! lololol.

[Snuts]

Not_sure_if_serious.jpg

Are you being snarky or do you actually believe that fossils are not real?

I had to google "snarky" to understand what that means. If it means sarcastic, yeah, I'm being snarky.


I remember telling me on Sunday School that God created the world in seven days:

On Monday, He created light, Earth, Sun and the Moon.
On Tuesday, He created the seas, rivers and lakes.
On Wednesday, He created the plants, trees and flowers.
On Thursday, He created the flying creatures and insects.
On Friday, He created the land creatures.
On Saturday, He created the humans and other commands.
On Sunday, He rested.

When I questioned my teological teacher (I dont know the correct word for that in english) about dinosaurs and their bones, she punished me and told my mother. I was 8 years old.

Sometimes that story pops in my head and that's why I said what I said.

[sgreger1]

God created man six thousand years ago. That's all rubbish.
Some jokers buried some fake Neanderthal bones and skulls to make a world wide mess.
God explains everything, so why change things? A 8 year old child gets a bullet in the head in France, dozens of children died in Switzerland, all that were acts of God but we as human beings cannot understand His higher purpose. So, don't get mad or confused, God is taking care of all of us and forget those Neanderthal, they are just like Trolls or Fairies.

Damn I feel angry today..

Not_sure_if_serious.jpg

Are you being snarky or do you actually believe that fossils are not real?

[truthwolf1]

Then there was also Cornelius.

[truthwolf1]

If you take a look at the graphic I posted on the first page, you can sort of get a picture of how close humans and neanderthals were relative to neanderthals and apes. We all share a lot of the smae DNA, but it has to be almost an exact match for us to reproduce across species.

For example, if you **** a sheep it won't have children, even though we are related to sheep and share much of the same DNA. A horse and a donkey can have offpsring (a mule), but it will be sterile and unable to reproduce. Humans and neanderthals were so close together that they were able to produce non-sterile offspring.

A neanderthal and an ape are waaay to different to be able to make children though.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...phylo-tree.png

Well, then who did Sasquatch sleep with? BEARS?

[Snuts]

God created man six thousand years ago. That's all rubbish.
Some jokers buried some fake Neanderthal bones and skulls to make a world wide mess.
God explains everything, so why change things? A 8 year old child gets a bullet in the head in France, dozens of children died in Switzerland, all that were acts of God but we as human beings cannot understand His higher purpose. So, don't get mad or confused, God is taking care of all of us and forget those Neanderthal, they are just like Trolls or Fairies.

Damn I feel angry today..

[sgreger1]

Were they not all sharing somekind of DNA?

If you take a look at the graphic I posted on the first page, you can sort of get a picture of how close humans and neanderthals were relative to neanderthals and apes. We all share a lot of the smae DNA, but it has to be almost an exact match for us to reproduce across species.

For example, if you **** a sheep it won't have children, even though we are related to sheep and share much of the same DNA. A horse and a donkey can have offpsring (a mule), but it will be sterile and unable to reproduce. Humans and neanderthals were so close together that they were able to produce non-sterile offspring.

A neanderthal and an ape are waaay to different to be able to make children though.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...phylo-tree.png

[truthwolf1]

1) The Piltdown Man was a hoax and has long since been confirmed as such. In fact we've known since 1953 that it was fake.

2) Neither modern humans nor Neanderthals would be capable of producing offspring with Apes, they are too genetically different.

Yes on 1

but it did take awhile!


but on 2

Were they not all sharing somekind of DNA?

[sgreger1]

So is that the Piltdown man who would be the offspring of neanderthals that mated with apes?

1) The Piltdown Man was a hoax and has long since been confirmed as such. In fact we've known since 1953 that it was fake.

2) Neither modern humans nor Neanderthals would be capable of producing offspring with Apes, they are too genetically different.

[sgreger1]

They come up with new theories about the life and extinction (or intermixture) of the Homines Neanderthalenses every other month.

Very similar to "anti tobacco science" this seems to be a playing field for underqualified or self-proclaimed scientists. Danny Vendramini should add "humourist" to his professions.

Cheers!

Some psudo-scientists come out with new theories but they are to be ignored. The record of what happened is pretty solid at this point and can be proven pretty extensibly. Things like claiming they looked like a big scarry gorilla are silly though, there is no actual evidence for it. The guy who created this theory is a film director and not a scientist.

[chainsnuser]

They come up with new theories about the life and extinction (or intermixture) of the Homines Neanderthalenses every other month.

Very similar to "anti tobacco science" this seems to be a playing field for underqualified or self-proclaimed scientists. Danny Vendramini should add "humourist" to his professions.

Cheers!

[truthwolf1]

So is that the Piltdown man who would be the offspring of neanderthals that mated with apes?

[Premium Parrots]

heeeey...I resemble that remark, lol. I'm not NEARLY hairy enough to even be in the running for the missing link ;-)

getting past the denial is the hardest part of the reality mate.




good luck